Pedagogical Approaches, Instructional Practices, and Challenges in Teaching Literature among Senior High School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I3.849Keywords:
Deped ILAW Framework, Instructional Practices, Literature Instruction, Pedagogical Approaches, Teacher Competence, Teaching ChallengesAbstract
This study examined the pedagogical approaches, instructional practices, self-assessed utilization, influencing factors, and challenges in teaching literature among Senior High School teachers in Cluster 3, Division of Masbate Province. It was anchored in Constructivist, Behaviorist, and Connectivist Learning Theories and used a systems-based conceptual framework. A mixed-method design combined descriptive quantitative research with a phenomenological qualitative approach. Forty-four literature teachers from seventeen public secondary schools participated through complete enumeration, while fifteen teachers were purposively selected for interviews. Data were gathered using an adapted survey questionnaire, open-ended questions, and semi-structured interviews and were analyzed through frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, standard deviations, and thematic analysis. Findings showed that the Information-Based Approach was used most frequently (M = 4.89, SD = 0.32), followed by the Personal-Response Approach (M = 4.77, SD = 0.42). Teachers reported Proficient-to-Expert utilization across lesson stages, with the Moral-Philosophical Approach obtaining the highest overall self-assessment (M = 3.53, SD = 0.43). Retelling literary texts, checking comprehension, incorporating moral values, and identifying values from texts were practiced by all respondents. Approach selection was influenced by learner characteristics, curriculum requirements, instructional resources, professional experience, pedagogical beliefs, and sociocultural relevance. Major challenges included literacy and comprehension difficulties, low motivation and engagement, limited instructional time, large classes, inadequate resources, technology constraints, and insufficient professional preparation. The study concluded that literature instruction was competent and multifaceted but required a more coherent integration of approaches across lesson stages. It recommended adopting the Integrated Literature Instructional Guide anchored on the DepEd ILAW Framework, strengthening teacher training, and improving contextualized and multimedia resources. The study primarily supports SDG 4—Quality Education and also contributes to SDGs 9, 10, and 17 by promoting instructional innovation, equitable access to learning resources, and institutional collaboration. Its sustainability impact lies in strengthening inclusive, culturally responsive, technologically supported, and institutionally sustainable literature education.
References
Abdul Samat, M. S., & Abdul Aziz, A. (2020). The effectiveness of multimedia learning in enhancing reading comprehension among Indigenous pupils. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.20
Akbar, R., & Muliati, S. (2021). Multimodal approaches in literature teaching: Integrating digital and visual texts. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 7(2), 67–81.
Alsubaie, M. A. (2016). Curriculum development: Teacher involvement in curriculum development. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(9), 106–107. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1095725.pdf
Alvermann, D. E., & Phelps, S. F. (2017). Content reading and literacy: Succeeding in today’s diverse classrooms (7th ed.). Pearson.
Aquino, G. V. (2003). Effective teaching. National Book Store.
Arias-Flores, L., Valverde, J., & Torres, M. (2022). Digital storytelling to improve reading comprehension in rural Ecuadorian learners. International Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 101–115.
Austin, S. (2022). The importance of literature in modern society. Findcourses.co.uk. https://www.findcourses.co.uk/inspiration/hobby-fun-leisure-articles/the-importance-of-literature-in-modern-society-17411
Baba, W. K. (2008). An investigation into teachers’ and students’ attitudes towards literature and its use in ESL classrooms: A case study at a matriculation centre in Malaysia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester].
Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research (12th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Balansag, S. (2018). Improvement of the teaching style: From traditional teacher-centered to student-centered teaching style. GRIN Publishing. https://www.grin.com/document/496335
Banks, J. A. (2016). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Routledge.
Barberos, M. T., Gozalo, A., & Padayogdog, E. (n.d.). The effect of the teacher’s teaching style on students’ motivation. NYU Steinhardt. https://steinhardt.nyu.edu/departments/teaching-and-learning/research/practitioner-action-research/effect-teachers-teaching
Bautista, M. (2019). Senior high school literature and student analytical skills. Education and Society, 37(1), 101–120.
Beach, R., & Marshall, J. (2021). Approaches to literature teaching: Engaging learners through discussion and performance. Literacy Research and Instruction, 60(5), 482–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2021.1928792
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2010). Class size and instructional outcomes in the Philippines. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9067-5
Bluman, A. G. (2009). Elementary statistics: A step by step approach. McGraw-Hill.
Borg, S. (2015). Factors influencing teachers’ selection of pedagogical approaches. Language Teaching Research, 19(3), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541726
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
Buque, J. S. (2022). Online learning strategies of senior high school students in reading 21st-century short stories. Asian Journal on Perspectives in Education, 3(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.63529/ajpe.v3i1.7661
Burke, A. (2013). Literature, literacy, and language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bustamante, J. A. (2022). The teaching of literature: Voices and lenses. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(4), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.4.12
Cabanilla, L. (2020). Contextual constraints in Philippine literature teaching. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 35(2), 88–102.
Calmorin, L. P., & Calmorin, M. A. (2005). Methods of research and thesis writing. Rex Book Store.
Carter, R., & Long, M. N. (1991). Teaching literature. Longman.
Chua, R. (2016). Professional development challenges in Southeast Asian literature classrooms. Asian Education Studies, 5(3), 120–136.
Collie, J., & Slater, S. (1990). Literature in the language classroom: A resource book of ideas and activities. Cambridge University Press.
Commission on Higher Education. (2019). CHED Memorandum Order No. 15, s. 2019: Policies, standards, and guidelines for graduate programs.
Conley, D. T. (2015). A new era for educational assessment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(8), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.1983
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Department of Education. (2013). K to 12 basic education program: Senior high school guide.
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 English curriculum guide. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/English-CG.pdf
Durante, P. G. C. (2025). Advancing critical literacy through critical literature pedagogy-based principles of literary education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 83(2), 196–205. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1472539.pdf
Elliott, V. (2018). Thinking about the coding process in qualitative data analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2850–2861. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
Fiel, Q. G. O., & Limpot, M. Y. (2024). Reading attitude, self-regulation, and technology-based instruction for effective reading: A structural relationship model in students’ intercultural communicative competence. Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies, 7(2), 344–357.
Finlay, L. (2012). Unfolding the phenomenological research process: Iterative stages of “seeing afresh.” Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 53(2), 172–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167812453877
Florentino, L. O. (2014). Integrating local literature in teaching English to first graders under K–12 curriculum. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(7), 1344–1351. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.7.1344-1351
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. E. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588114
Garcia, C. D., & Reganit, A. R. (2010). Developing competencies in research and thesis writing. Books Atbp. Publishing.
García, O., & Li Wei. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Gray, A. J. (1997). Constructivist teaching and learning (SSTA Research Centre Report No. 97-07). Saskatchewan School Trustees Association. https://saskschoolboards.ca/wp-content/uploads/97-07.htm
Hirvela, A. (1996). Reader-response theory and ELT. ELT Journal, 50(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.2.127
Ho, E. S. C., & Gan, L. (2023). Instructional practices and students’ reading performance: A comparative study of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2018. Language Testing in Asia, 13, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00261-1
Hulstijn, J. H. (2015). Language proficiency in native and non-native speakers: Theory and research. John Benjamins.
Hwang, D., & Embi, M. A. (2007). Approaches employed by secondary school teachers to teaching the literature component in English. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 22, 1–23.
Jewitt, C. (2013). Multimodal literacy. Routledge.
Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 297–319). Sage.
Kamarudin, H. H. (1988). Kaedah pengajaran kesusasteraan. Penerbit Fajar Bakti.
Kelly, G. A. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs: Vol. 1. A theory of personality. Routledge. (Original work published 1955)
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Kumar, R. (2005). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). Sage.
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733048
Lazar, G. (2009). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge University Press.
Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
Liu, X., & Xu, L. (2025). Applying the Production-Oriented Approach to extended reading in senior high school English. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 8(9), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2025.8.9.1
Liu, Y. (2022). A literature review of English discourse teaching in senior high school. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 4(1), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.54097/ijeh.v4i1.1155
Lorenzo, A. A. (2022). Strategies in teaching 21st century literature: Results from a systematic review of literature. E-DAWA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.56901/SEEN3426
Ma, L., Ismail, L., & Saharuddin, N. (2023). Effectiveness of literature circles in developing English language reading ability: A systematic review. English Language Teaching, 16(7), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n7p47
Maley, A. (2001). Literature in the language classroom. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 180–185). Cambridge University Press.
Maley, A., & Duff, A. (1990). Literature. Oxford University Press.
Michaelides, D. T. (1997). Exact tests via complete enumeration: A distributed computing approach [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton].
Moody, H. L. B. (1971). The teaching of literature. Longman.
Moody, H. L. B. (1983). Approaches to the study of literature: A practitioner’s view. In C. J. Brumfit (Ed.), Teaching literature overseas: Language-based approaches (pp. 17–36). Pergamon Press.
Morse, J. M., & Mitcham, C. (2002). Exploring qualitatively-derived concepts: Inductive–deductive pitfalls. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(4), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100404
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Nanquil, L. M. (2020). Perspectives, practices, and insights on the teaching of literature: A reflective narrative. MEXTESOL Journal, 44(3), 1–10. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1311054
Nawawi, N. N., & Mohd Kamil, F. (2023). The teacher’s approaches in teaching English literature component: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Evolusi, 4(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.61688/jev.v4i1.59
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton University Press.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2011). Data analysis in mixed research: A primer. International Journal of Education, 3(1), Article E13. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v3i1.618
Padhi, P. K. (2018). The relevance of reading literature in the 21st century. International Journal of Management, Technology and Engineering, 8(9), 2089–2094. https://ijamtes.org/gallery/264.%20sept%20ijmte%20-%201059.pdf
Palbusa, M. Y., Jr. (2021). Senior high school as critical pedagogy. Asian Journal of Contemporary Education, 5(1), 34–44. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1351547.pdf
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Parojenog, R. C. (2020). Approaches in teaching literature employed by senior high school teachers. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.54476/iimrj366
Patil, G. P., Gore, S. D., & Taillie, C. (2011). Composite sampling: A novel method to accomplish observational economy in environmental studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7628-4
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
PhilAtlas. (n.d.). Mobo, Province of Masbate. https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/bicol/masbate/mobo.html
Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures (A. Rosin, Trans.). Viking Press.
Povey, J. F. (1979). The teaching of literature in advanced ESL classes. In M. Celce-Murcia & L. McIntosh (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 162–186). Newbury House.
Rashid, R. A., Vethamani, M. E., & Abdul Rahman, S. B. (2010). Approaches employed by teachers in teaching literature to less proficient students in Form 1 and Form 2. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n4p87
Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012 (Phil.).
Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667237
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sage, H. (1987). Incorporating literature in ESL instruction (Language in Education: Theory and Practice No. 66). Prentice Hall.
Salaguinto, R. J. (2024). Teacher’s competence in teaching 21st century literature: Basis for faculty development program. Studies in Technology and Education, 2(2), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.55687/ste.v2i2.57
Salandanan, G. G. (2005). Teaching and the teacher. Lorimar Publishing.
Sarantakos, S. (1998). Social research (2nd ed.). Macmillan.
Savvidou, C. (2004). An integrated approach to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(12). http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Savvidou-Literature.html
Shamshul, I. S. M., Ismail, H. H., & Nordin, N. M. (2024). Using digital technologies in teaching and learning of literature in ESL classrooms: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.10
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10. https://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Sinaga, T., Kadaryanto, B., & Aulia, N. (2023). Indonesian high school students’ critical thinking and literary text comprehension. ELE Reviews: English Language Education Reviews, 3(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.22515/elereviews.v3i2.7621
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
Timucin, M. (2001). Gaining insights into alternative teaching approaches employed in an EFL literature class. CAUCE, 24, 269–293.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Tooman, T. (n.d.). Affective learning: Activities to promote values comprehension. Soulstice Training. https://www.soulsticetraining.com/commentary/affective-learning-activities-to-promote-values-comprehension/
Torrano, L. (2019). Use of audio-video recordings to enhance teaching of Philippine literature to Grade 7 students of Rosario National High School. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2K). https://ojs.aaresearchindex.com/index.php/AAJMRA/article/view/7583
Twinkl. (2025). What are the five pedagogical approaches? https://www.twinkl.com.ph/teaching-wiki/five-pedagogical-approaches
Twomey Fosnot, C. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: A constructivist approach for teaching. Teachers College Press.
UNESCO. (2015). Education for all 2000–2015: Achievements and challenges. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232205
Van, T. T. M. (2009). The relevance of literary analysis to teaching literature in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 47(3), 2–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ923454
Verner, S. (n.d.). Today a reader, tomorrow a leader: Strategies for teaching literature in the ESL classroom. BusyTeacher. https://busyteacher.org/6504-strategies-teachingliteratureesl-classroom.html
Vetter, T. R. (2017). Descriptive statistics: Reporting the answers to the 5 basic questions of who, what, why, when, where, and a sixth, so what? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(5), 1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002471
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Whitehead, R. (1968). Children’s literature: Strategies of teaching. Prentice-Hall.
Whitley, E., & Ball, J. (2002). Statistics review 1: Presenting and summarising data. Critical Care, 6(1), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc1455
Wissing, D. R., & Timm, D. (2012). Statistics for the nonstatistician: Part I. Southern Medical Journal, 105(3), 126–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3182498ad5
Wright, D. (2019). Why read literature? Memoria Press. https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/why-read-literature/
Öhman, A. (2005). Qualitative methodology for rehabilitation research. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(5), 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040056
