Transitioning Pedagogies: Baby Boomer Educators' Adaptation From Chalkboard To New Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I1.51Keywords:
Baby Boomer educators; digital transformation; phenomenology; technology integration; Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK); Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA)Abstract
This study examined Baby Boomer educators’ lived experiences as they transitioned from traditional chalkboard-based instruction to technology-integrated teaching amid rapid digital transformation in education. Anchored in the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the study explored how educators made meaning of technological change and how perceived usefulness and ease of use shaped their adaptation. Using a qualitative, transcendental phenomenological design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews supported by field notes, classroom observations, and document review. Respondents were Baby Boomer educators (ages 61–79) selected through purposive sampling from institutions in Quezon City, Bulacan, and Paranaque. The findings indicate varied baseline digital proficiency, but consistent willingness to learn, with educators gradually adopting tools such as PowerPoint, Canva, Moodle, Google Classroom, Kahoot, and Quizziz. Participants described the transition as initially difficult due to limited time, unfamiliarity with software, and anxiety about technical issues, while systemic barriers such as inconsistent internet access and unequal device availability also constrained implementation. Despite these challenges, educators reported coping through self-directed learning, peer collaboration, and available institutional or external support, and they perceived technology integration as improving lesson delivery, reducing some administrative burdens, and increasing student engagement and participation. The study concludes that bridging infrastructural gaps and strengthening continuous professional support are essential to sustaining inclusive technology integration. The study aligns with SDG 4 – Quality Education through its focus on teacher capability-building and effective digital pedagogy, and with SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure by highlighting the role of connectivity and digital systems in educational transformation. In sustainability terms, the study contributes to educational and institutional sustainability by emphasizing that technology-enabled learning becomes sustainable only when supported by training, equitable access, and collaborative cultures that prevent widening generational and resource-based inequalities.
References
Abildinova, A., Sadykova, G., & Zhaparova, R. (2023). The impact of digital tools in transforming high school education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11000-x
Al-Emran, M., & Shaalan, K. (2021). A systematic review of the Technology Acceptance Model in educational contexts. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10307-0
Al-Harbi, S., & Al-Awidi, H. (2022). The influence of school principals’ digital leadership on teachers’ technology integration during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kuwait. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12345–12367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10845-6r
Creswell, [initial(s) missing]. (2021). [Title missing]. [Publisher/source missing].
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
González-Sanmamed, M., Sangrà, A., & Muñoz-Carril, P. C. (2020). University teachers’ perceptions of barriers to the integration of digital technologies in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 749–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09706-y
Habeshian, S. (2023, September 7). Tech schooling after COVID “super-charged” education inequality, UNESCO says. Axios.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Scherer, R. (2021). Investigating the acceptance of digital textbooks: A study on university students’ behavioral intentions and the moderating role of gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00255-4
Khosravi, S., Bailey, S. G., Parvizi, H., & Ghannam, R. (2021). Learning enhancement in higher education with wearable technology (arXiv:2111.07365). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.07365
Pen, P., & Morrell, E. (2024). Technology use among late-career educators in Cambodia: A case study of perceptions and challenges. International Journal of Educational Research, 125, Article 102050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102050
Ringgold, J. (2025, April 25). MPS bond: We’re teaching today’s students in yesterday’s classrooms. Midland Daily News.
Teng, F., & Wang, Z. (2021). Understanding student engagement with educational technology in the EFL classroom: Comparing learning management and social networking systems. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-020-00522-5
Wilkes, M., et al. (2020). Use of digital technology in education: Literature review. Department for Education, South Australia.
