Social Media Feedback Response Strategies of EARIST (Eulogio "Amang" Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology): Inputs for Collaborative Plan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.692Keywords:
Action Taken, Digital Communication, Feedback Management, Social Media Feedback, Stakeholder Engagement, Stakeholder Feedback, Sustainable Development Goals, TransparencyAbstract
This study assessed the social media feedback and response strategies of the Eulogio "Amang" Rodriguez Institute of Science and Technology (EARIST) to develop a collaborative plan for enhancing stakeholder engagement. Specifically, it examined the characteristics of social media feedback, institutional response strategies, differences in the perceptions of employees and students, and the factors influencing effective digital communication practices. The study employed a quantitative descriptive-comparative research design using a cross-sectional survey approach. Data were collected through a validated researcher-made questionnaire administered to 112 purposively selected respondents, consisting of 14 employees and 98 students. The data were analyzed using percentage, weighted mean, ranking, and t-test. The findings revealed that EARIST's social media feedback and response strategies were generally effective. Feedback Type, Feedback Reach and Visibility, and Feedback Content Quality were identified as the strongest dimensions, while Action Taken received the lowest assessment, indicating the need to improve the resolution and follow-through of stakeholder concerns. Significant differences were found between the perceptions of employees and students, with students consistently providing more favorable assessments. Time constraints, workload, limited resources, and the availability of trained personnel were identified as the primary factors influencing effective social media feedback management. The study concluded that strengthening feedback resolution processes, establishing a dedicated social media management team, implementing standardized communication policies, providing regular personnel training, and allocating additional resources would enhance institutional communication and stakeholder engagement. The study supports Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4: Quality Education by promoting effective communication that enhances stakeholder engagement within educational institutions and SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions by encouraging transparent, responsive, and accountable institutional communication. The findings contribute to institutional sustainability by strengthening digital communication practices, improving stakeholder participation, and supporting responsive governance through effective social media management.
References
Capriotti, P., & Zeler, I. (2023). Analysing effective social media communication in higher education institutions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 656.
Capriotti, P., Carretón, C., & Zeler, I. (2024). Exploring interactivity strategies in social media communications of leading universities: A cross-continental study. SAGE Open, 14(2).
Gilani, D. (2024). Student attitudes and preferences towards communications from their university: A meta-analysis of student communications research within UK higher education institutions. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 46(3), 274–290.
Górska, A. M. (2024). Navigating the COVID-19 crisis: Higher education institutions and the three shades of social media communication. Sustainability, 16(9), 3619.
Jongsma, M. V., Scholten, D. J., van Muijlwijk-Koezen, J. E., & Meeter, M. (2023). Online versus offline peer feedback in higher education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(2), 329–354.
Kerman, N. T., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., Er, E., van Ginkel, S., & Noroozi, O. (2024). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 763–813.
Perez, E., Manca, S., Fernández-Pascual, R., & McGuckin, C. (2023). A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 11921–11950.
Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2024). Students’ affective engagements in peer feedback across offline and online English learning environments in Thai higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(60).
