EDUCONNECT360: School Management System for Predicting and Recommending Students at Risk of Dropping Out in Public Secondary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.686Keywords:
EduConnect360, Predictive Analytics, Logistic Regression, Recommendation Engine, Learner RetentionAbstract
This study developed and evaluated EduConnect360, an integrated school management system designed to predict and recommend interventions for students at risk of dropping out in public secondary schools. The system responds to the limitations of manual attendance recording, delayed risk identification, fragmented student records, and reactive intervention practices by integrating attendance monitoring, behavioral incident reporting, academic performance tracking, demographic profiling, predictive analytics, and intervention recommendations into one centralized platform. The study was anchored on an Input–Process–Output framework with a feedback loop, the Evolutionary Prototyping Model, the Technology Acceptance Model, and the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Software Product Quality Model. It employed a developmental, descriptive-evaluative, and convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered through TAM-based surveys, ISO/IEC 25010:2011 expert evaluation, open-ended responses, interviews, stakeholder consultations, simulated user sessions, and synthetic data validation. The respondents included 107 school personnel from the Division of Quezon and 11 ICT coordinators from the Real District. EduConnect360 was developed as a web-based modular platform using PHP, MySQL, and JavaScript, with role-based dashboards for administrators, teachers, class advisers, guidance counselors/designates, security personnel, students, and parents. The system used logistic regression to classify students into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups based on real-time attendance, behavioral, and socioeconomic data, while academic grades were excluded from prediction and used only for post-hoc validation. Synthetic data validation involved 1,120 records and showed that Logistic Regression remained highly effective when grades were excluded, achieving 0.93 accuracy, while risk distribution showed 50.9% low risk, 26.8% moderate risk, and 22.3% high risk. School personnel rated the system highly across TAM constructs, including perceived usefulness, ease of use, satisfaction, attitude toward use, and behavioral intention. ICT coordinators also rated the system highly across ISO/IEC 25010:2011 characteristics, including functional suitability, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and maintainability. Key concerns included the need for user training, technical support, offline functionality, infrastructure readiness, integration with existing DepEd systems, interface improvements, and real-world validation using actual student records. The study concludes that EduConnect360 is a usable, technically reliable, secure, and practical platform for proactive student risk monitoring and intervention planning. It recommends broader pilot testing, capacity-building, infrastructure support, DepEd system integration, predictive model enhancement, accessibility improvements, and longitudinal research on retention, workload, and intervention effectiveness. The study aligns with SDG 4 on Quality Education, SDG 9 on Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, SDG 16 on Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions, and SDG 17 on Partnerships for the Goals. Its sustainability impact is primarily educational, institutional, technological, governance-oriented, and community-based because it supports learner retention, data-driven school management, secure student information handling, stakeholder collaboration, and evidence-based intervention planning.
References
Aguiar, E., Chawla, N. V., Brockman, J., Ambrose, G. A., & Goodrich, V. (2015). Engagement vs. performance: Using electronic portfolios to predict first-year student success. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723576.2723610
Albert, J. R. G., Basillote, L. B., Alinsunurin, J. P., Vizmanos, J. F. V., Muñoz, M. S., & Hernandez, A. C. (2023, December). Sustainable Development Goal 4: How does the Philippines fare on quality education? Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pidswebs.pids.gov.ph/CDN/document/pidsdps2316.pdf
Al-Samarraie, H., & Ghazal, R. (2021). The impact of user interface design on student engagement in e-learning platforms: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies.
Alyahyan, E., & Düştegör, D. (2020). Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7
Asian Development Bank. (2021). Education and employment outcomes in the Philippines. https://www.adb.org/publications/education-outcomes-philippines
Bakhshinategh, B., Zahedi, S., & Ghassemian, H. (2018). Predicting student academic performance using machine learning techniques: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2685–2715.
Bowers, A. J., & Zhou, X. (2019). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC): A diagnostic measure for evaluating the accuracy of predictors of education outcomes. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 24(1), 20–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2018.1523734
Bravo, E. D. (2023). Trends and causes of student dropouts in public higher education in the northern Philippines: A data visualization approach. Journal for Educators, Teachers, and Trainers, 14(3), 705–721. https://jett.labosfor.com/index.php/jett/article/download/1944/1128/7211
Buenaño-Fernández, D., Gil, D., & Luján-Mora, S. (2019). Application of machine learning in predicting performance for computer engineering students: A case study. Sustainability, 11(10), 2833. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102833
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dagdagui, R. T. (2022). Predicting students' academic performance using regression analysis. American Journal of Educational Research, 10(11), 640–646. https://pubs.sciepub.com/education/10/11/2/education-10-11-2.pdf
Dawson, S., & Gašević, D. (2017). Learning analytics: New horizons for teaching and learning in the digital age. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(2), 249–257.
Department of Education. (2012). Child protection policy (DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2012/05/14/do-40-s-2012-deped-child-protection-policy/
Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015). https://www.deped.gov.ph/orders/do-8-s-2015/
Department of Education. (2017). Adoption of new school forms for Kindergarten, Senior High School, Alternative Learning System, Health and Nutrition, and standardization of permanent records (DepEd Order No. 58, s. 2017). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/11/27/do-58-s-2017-adoption-of-new-school-forms-for-kindergarten-senior-high-school-alternative-learning-system-health-and-nutrition-and-standardization-of-permanent-records-3/
Department of Education. (2018). Guidelines on learner promotion and retention under the K to 12 Basic Education Program. https://www.teacherph.com/deped-guidelines-learner-promotion-and-retention/
Dumitrache, G. (2019). Identifying risks in educational organizations. Revista Economia Contemporană. https://oaji.net/articles/2019/4505-1577097093.pdf
Espinosa, A. A., Gomez, M. A. C., Miranda, P. A., David, A. P., Abulon, E. L. R., Hermosisima, M. V. C., Quinosa, E. A., Jr., Soliman, A. A., De Vera, J. L., Claros, I. H. A., Cruz, H. G. M., & Gonzales, N. S. J. (2023). Technology in education: A case study on the Philippines. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000387743
Flood, D., England, M., & Grawemeyer, B. (2025). Predicting at-risk programming students in small imbalanced datasets using synthetic data. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/html/2505.17128v1
Gonzalez-Nucamendi, A., Noguez, J., Neri, L., Robledo-Rella, V., & García-Castelán, R. M. (2023). Predictive analytics study to determine undergraduate students at risk of dropout. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1244686. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1244686/full
Hassan, M. A., Muse, A. H., & Nadarajah, S. (2024). Predicting student dropout rates using supervised machine learning: Insights from the 2022 National Education Accessibility Survey in Somaliland. Applied Sciences, 14(17), 7593. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14177593
Hellas, A., Ihantola, P., Petersen, A., Ajanovski, V. V., Gutica, M., Hynninen, T., Knutas, A., Leinonen, J., Messom, C., & Liao, S. N. (2018). Predicting academic performance: A systematic literature review. In Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (pp. 175–199). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3293881.3295783
Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y.-K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z
Khalil, M., Liu, Y., & Abouzied, A. (2025). AI for data generation in education: Scaling teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(2), Article 13580. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13580
Kucirkova, N., & Rowsell, J. (2019). The research and innovation cycle: How literary practice can improve educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(2), 127–142.
Kurni, M., Mohammed, M. S., & Srinivasa, K. G. (2023). Predictive analytics in education. In Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications. Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-32653-0_4
Lakkaraju, H., Aguiar, E., Shan, C., Miller, D., Bhanpuri, N., Ghani, R., & Addison, K. L. (2015, August). A machine learning framework to identify students at risk of adverse academic outcomes. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 1909–1918). https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2783258.2788620
Mansmann, U., & Ön, B. I. (2025). The validation of prediction models deserves more recognition. BMC Medicine, 23, 166. https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-025-03994-3
Manzanares, P., Lee, C., & Patel, R. (2021). Real-time monitoring and predictive modeling in education: Global trends and applications. Educational Technology Research & Development, 29(4), 211–230. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388489912_Real-Time_Performance_Monitoring_and_Predictive_Analysis_in_Education
Müller, A. C., & Guido, S. (2016). Introduction to machine learning with Python: A guide for data scientists. O'Reilly Media.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Artificial intelligence and education: Guidance for policymakers on AI-driven learning analytics and student risk assessment. https://www.oecd.org/education/artificial-intelligence-and-education.htm
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2016). Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice: A systematic literature review of methods and applications. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(4), 91–104.
Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2020). Adaptive learning systems and learning analytics: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1957–1988.
Paterson, K., & Guerrero, A. (2024). Predictive analytics in education: Considerations in predicting versus explaining college student retention. ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1401369.pdf
Potane, J., Banaag, R. A., & Sumodevilla, J. L. C. (2024). Factors affecting student dropout behavior: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Management and Innovation, 5(1), 53–70. https://www.academia.edu/122672232/Factors_Affecting_Student_Drop_Out_Behavior_A_Systematic_Review
Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence. (2024). Student behavior and engagement: Lagging indicators. https://prichardcommittee.org/student-behavior-and-engagement-lagging-indicators/
Pusztai, G., Fényes, H., & Kovács, K. (2022). Factors influencing the chance of dropout or being at risk of dropout in higher education. Education Sciences, 12(11), 804. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/11/804
Ramanathan, R., & Balasubramanian, T. (2018). Exploring the high potential factors that affect students' academic performance. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering, 8(6), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijeme.2018.06.02
Republic of the Philippines. (2012, August 15). Republic Act No. 10173: Data Privacy Act of 2012. LawPhil
Siemens, G., & Dawson, S. (2021). Learning analytics and academic advising: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 23(1), 11–28.
Singh, H. P., & Alhulail, H. (2022). Predicting student-teachers' dropout risk and early identification: A four-step logistic regression approach. IEEE Access, 10, 6470–6482. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4588338
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385723
UNESCO. (2024a). Artificial intelligence, blockchain, and extended reality in lifelong learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391599
UNESCO. (2024b). Educational management information systems (EMIS): A guide for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.
Ünsal Özbek, E. B., & Yetkiner, A. (2021). Logistic regression approach in classifying the effectiveness of online education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(Special Issue), 21–31. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1354802.pdf
Vie, D., Ren, X., & Han, T. (2022). Privacy-preserving synthetic data generation for educational analytics. https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.03202
World Bank. (2022). The economic impacts of learning poverty and dropout rates in the Philippines. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099000207152223103/idu002b5536c0db4104ec3087d809906ec2eae56
Zakariyah, S. S. (2020). Guide to evolutionary prototyping. Academia.edu. https://www.academia.edu/8587413/Guide_to_Evolutionary_Prototyping
