A Frequency-Based Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Force, Boundary, and Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.672Keywords:
Frequency-Based Framework, Force, Boundary, Space, Dimensional Analysis, Theoretical Physics, MotionAbstract
This paper develops a frequency-based conceptual framework for interpreting selected relationships among force, boundary formation, and space. The original draft proposed the use of temporal frequency and distance frequency to reformulate classical expressions of velocity, force, boundary, and space. To make the framework suitable for journal presentation, the present version organizes the proposal as an exploratory theoretical model rather than as a replacement for established physical laws. The framework defines temporal frequency as f_t = 1/t and distance frequency as f_d = 1/d, allowing velocity to be expressed as v = f_t/f_d. From this basis, the paper distinguishes a mass-frequency interaction index, Φ = m f_t, from a dimensionally compatible force expression, F* = m f_t²/f_d. It also reformulates the proposed boundary equation as a density-related term, D_B = m f_d³, and extends it into a pressure-related proxy when linked with velocity. Finally, the proposed space equation is interpreted as a spatial-energy interaction term, S_E = m v², rather than as literal geometric space. Through dimensional analysis and conceptual comparison with standard mechanics, the paper identifies the possible usefulness, limits, and validation requirements of the proposed framework. The study concludes that frequency-based notation may serve as a heuristic model for organizing relationships among time, distance, mass, and motion, but further mathematical proof, simulation, and experimental testing are necessary before the framework can be treated as a physical theory.
References
Barenblatt, G. I. (1996). Scaling, self-similarity, and intermediate asymptotics. Cambridge University Press.
Buckingham, E. (1914). On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations. Physical Review, 4(4), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.4.345
Bureau International des Poids et Mesures. (2019). The International System of Units (SI) (9th ed.). https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure
Einstein, A. (1905). Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? Annalen der Physik, 18, 639–641.
Giancoli, D. C. (2014). Physics: Principles with applications (7th ed.). Pearson.
Goldstein, H., Poole, C., & Safko, J. (2002). Classical mechanics (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2018). Fundamentals of physics (11th ed.). Wiley.
Newton, I. (1999). The Principia: Mathematical principles of natural philosophy (I. B. Cohen & A. Whitman, Trans.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1687)
Serway, R. A., & Jewett, J. W. (2018). Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Taylor, E. F., & Wheeler, J. A. (1992). Spacetime physics: Introduction to special relativity (2nd ed.). W. H. Freeman.
Tipler, P. A., & Llewellyn, R. A. (2012). Modern physics (6th ed.). W. H. Freeman.
Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2020). University physics with modern physics (15th ed.). Pearson.
