School Heads Mobility: Lived Experiences and Effects on Leadership and Succession Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.661Keywords:
Adaptability, Leadership Continuity, Mobility, School Heads, Stakeholder Engagement, Succession Programs, Transformational Leadership, Transition ExperiencesAbstract
This study explored the lived experiences of school heads regarding mobility and succession programs in the REINA District of Quezon Province, comprising the municipalities of Real, Infanta, and General Nakar. Anchored on the Transformational Leadership Theory, the study examined the effects of mobility on leadership continuity, school performance, stakeholder relationships, coping strategies, and leadership transitions. A qualitative transcendental phenomenological design was employed to understand the experiences of six school heads who had undergone three to five mobility assignments and had served as school heads for five to ten years. Data were collected through a researcher-made semi-structured interview guide that underwent validation and pilot testing. Individual interviews were conducted and analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological method. The findings revealed that school heads encountered adjustment challenges related to unfamiliar environments, increased responsibilities, and changing stakeholder expectations. However, support from teachers, parents, local government units, and community stakeholders facilitated smoother transitions and strengthened school operations. Mobility enhanced leadership adaptability, resilience, collaboration, and professional growth, although temporary disruptions in continuity and relationship building were also experienced. Participants identified trust-building, inclusive leadership, collaboration, and emotional readiness as critical factors in managing successful transitions. Repeated mobility experiences increased confidence, leadership competence, and the capacity to respond effectively to diverse school contexts. The study concluded that school head mobility is both a leadership challenge and an opportunity for professional development and educational improvement. It recommends strengthening transition support, leadership development initiatives, mentoring programs, stakeholder collaboration, and succession planning mechanisms. The study aligns with SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by promoting effective educational leadership, workforce development, and institutional continuity. The findings contribute to educational, institutional, community, and governance sustainability through strengthened leadership practices and stakeholder engagement.
References
Almagro, A. M., Bacang, A. B., & Calumpang, E. N. (2025). Reflections on school governance: The lived experiences of school heads. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 460–466. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.245
Anacleto, G. C. (2017). School heads’ mobility to organizational dynamics, educational reform management and school performance indicators [Unpublished thesis].
Aravena, F. (2022). Principal succession in schools: A literature review (2003–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 354–370.
Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118402.
Bartanen, B., Grissom, J. A., & Rogers, L. K. (2019). The impacts of principal turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 350–374.
Bengtson, E., Zepeda, S. J., & Parylo, O. (2013). School systems’ practices of controlling socialization during principal succession: Looking through the lens of an organizational socialization theory. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(2), 143–164.
Berry, P. C. (2014). Where are all of the principals going? An analysis of public school principal attrition, mobility, and turnover. State University of New York at Albany.
Béteille, T., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41(4), 904–919.
Bloomberg, L. D., & Volpe, M. (2019). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A roadmap from beginning to end.
Boyce, J., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Principal turnover: Are there different types of principals who move from or leave their schools? A latent class analysis of the 2007–2008 Schools and Staffing Survey and the 2008–2009 Principal Follow-Up Survey. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 15(3), 237–272.
Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2012). Estimating the effect of leaders on public sector productivity: The case of school principals (No. W17803). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bryan, J., & Henry, L. (2012). A model for building school-family-community partnerships: Principles and process. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.2012.00052.x
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661.
Chumba, S. K. (2014). Principals mobility in Kenya: Causes and its effects on teachers’ efficacy. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(6).
Cieminski, A. B. (2018). Practices that support leadership succession and principal retention. Education Leadership Review, 19(1), 21–41.
Clark, D., Martorell, P., & Rockoff, J. (2009). School principals and school performance (Working Paper 38). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236–264.
Daresh, J. (2004). Mentoring school leaders: Professional promise or predictable problems? Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 495–517.
De Torres, E. S., Faltado, S., & Abrea, R. (2025). Management capabilities of head teachers. Asian Research Journal of Education, 2(3), 115–143.
DeMatthews, D. E., Knight, D. S., & Shin, J. (2022). The principal-teacher churn: Understanding the relationship between leadership turnover and teacher attrition. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(1), 76–109.
Dhuey, E., & Smith, J. (2014). How school principals influence student learning (IZA Discussion Paper No. 7949). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/7949/how-school-principals-influence-student-learning
Eckert, J., & Morgan, G. (2023). Collective leadership: A catalyst for school improvement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(80), n80.
Elmalak-Watad, A., & Schechter, C. (2025). Social mobility leadership: The principal’s role in leading students’ mobility within a minority group. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 1–21.
Emmel, N. (2013). Sampling and choosing cases in qualitative research: A realist approach.
Engida, Z. M., Alemu, A. E., & Mulugeta, M. A. (2022). The effect of change leadership on employees’ readiness to change: The mediating role of organizational culture. Future Business Journal, 8(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-022-00148-2
Fancera, S. (2016). Principal leadership to improve collective teacher efficacy. Education Leadership Review, 17(2), 74–85.
Fink, D., & Brayman, C. (2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 62–89.
Fuller, E. J., & Young, M. D. (2009). Tenure and retention of newly hired principals in Texas. University Council for Educational Administration, Department of Educational Administration, University of Texas at Austin.
Gao, L. (2021). Analysis on the professional development of principals in the reform of headmaster rank system: A case study based on structural theory.
Gates, S. M., Ringel, J. S., Santibanez, L., Guarino, C., Ghosh-Dastidar, B., & Brown, A. (2006). Mobility and turnover among school principals. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 289–302.
Goldring, E. B., Clark, M. A., Rubin, M., Rogers, L. K., Grissom, J. A., Gill, B., ... & Burnett, A. (2020). Changing the principal supervisor role to better support principals: Evidence from the Principal Supervisor Initiative.
Grissom, J. A., & Bartanen, B. (2019). Principal effectiveness and principal turnover. Education Finance and Policy, 14(3), 355–382.
Guetterman, T. (2015). Descriptions of sampling practices within five approaches to qualitative research in education and the health sciences.
Guiab, M. R., & Gallestre, J. F. (2015). School managers’ leadership styles and teacher performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1(31).
Gumarang, B. K., Jr., Mallannao, R. C., & Gumarang, B. K. (2021). Colaizzi's methods in descriptive phenomenology: Basis of a Filipino novice researcher. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(10), 928–933. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.02.10.10
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, L., Cunningham, M., Hansen, A., McIntyre, D., Oliver, C., & Pell, T. (2007). The status of teachers and the teaching profession in England: Views from inside and outside the profession. The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge.
Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. SUNY Press.
Honig, M. I., & Rainey, L. R. (2014). Central office leadership in principal professional learning communities: The practice beneath the policy. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–48.
Husain, A. N., Miller, L. C., & Player, D. W. (2021). Principal turnover: Using teacher assessments of principal quality to understand who leaves the principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(5), 683–715.
Ismail, A. N., Febrianti, D., Kasanah, U., Setiawan, H., & Suprayitno, E. (2026). Harmonising school leadership and foundations for human resource development in early childhood education. International Journal of Education Management and Religion, 3(1), 548–565.
Ismail, M., Khati̇Bi̇, A., & Azam, S. F. (2022). Impact of school culture on school effectiveness in government schools in Maldives. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 261–279.
Gato, J., & Escote, M. J. (2025). Lived experiences of school heads in improving teachers’ teamwork. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5422578
Janson, A. (2008). Extracting leadership knowledge from formative experiences. Leadership, 4(1), 73–94.
Jay, A. (2014). The principals’ leadership style and teachers’ performance in secondary schools of Gambella Regional State (Doctoral dissertation, Jimma University).
Jerico, P. (2009). No fear. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Korach, S., & Cosner, S. (2017). Developing the leadership pipeline: Comprehensive leadership development. In Handbook of Research on the Education of School Leaders (pp. 262–282).
Lavigne, H. J., Shakman, K., Zweig, J., & Greller, S. L. (2016). Principals' time, tasks, and professional development: An analysis of Schools and Staffing Survey data (REL 2017–201). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast & Islands.
Lee, L. C. (2015). School performance trajectories and the challenges for principal succession. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 262–286.
Leithwood, K., & Seashore-Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Levin, S., Scott, C., Yang, M., Leung, M., & Bradley, K. (2020). Supporting a strong, stable principal workforce: What matters and what can be done.
Li, C., Law, E. H.-F., Huang, Y., & Ding, K. (2025). Balancing tradition, reform, and constraints: A study of principal leadership practices in Chinese primary schools. Education Sciences, 15(8), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15080988
Liu, Y., & Werblow, J. (2019). The operation of distributed leadership and the relationship with organizational commitment and job satisfaction of principals and teachers: A multi-level model and meta-analysis using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 41–55.
Louis, K. S. (2015). Linking leadership to learning: State, district and local effects. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30321.
Moran, D. (2013). Edmund Husserl and phenomenology. In Philosophy of Mind: The Key Thinkers (pp. 37–58).
Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643–644.
Moustakas, C. (1994). Transcendental phenomenology: Conceptual framework. In Phenomenological Research Methods (pp. 25–43).
Ni, Y., Sun, M., & Rorrer, A. (2015). Principal turnover: Upheaval and uncertainty in charter schools? Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 409–437.
Papa Jr., F. (2007). Why do principals change schools? A multivariate analysis of principal retention. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(3), 267–290.
Parylo, O., & Zepeda, S. J. (2015). Connecting principal succession and professional learning: A cross-case analysis. Journal of School Leadership, 25(5), 940–968.
Player, D., Youngs, P., Perrone, F., & Grogan, E. (2017). What principal leadership and person-job fit are associated with teacher mobility and attrition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 330–339.
Rangel, V. S. (2018). A review of the literature on principal turnover. Review of Educational Research, 88(1), 87–124. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317743197
Rousseau, M. L. (2011). A leadership solution to workplace stress. Florida Public Health Review, 8(1), 11.
Saleem, H. (2015). The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 563–569.
Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2020). Systems thinking leadership: New explorations for school improvement. Management in Education, 34(3), 107–114.
Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2009). Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10(5), 491–497.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292430
Tekleselassie, A. A., & Villarreal III, P. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251–293.
Tu, H. (2020). The relationship between principals’ ways of making meaning and their knowing-doing gap as related to Marzano’s principal leadership responsibilities. Sage Graduate School.
Turnbull, B. J., Riley, D. L., Arcaira, E. R., Anderson, L. M., & MacFarlane, J. R. (2013). Six districts begin the principal pipeline initiative. In Building a Stronger Principalship: Volume 1. Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Walker, A., & Crow, G. M. (2006). Complexity and the beginning principal in the United States: Perspectives on socialization. Journal of Educational Administration.
Yan, R. (2019). Principal turnover: How can we improve working conditions to keep our principals? Indiana Business Review, 94(2), 1–5.
Yan, R. (2020). The influence of working conditions on principal turnover in K–12 public schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(1), 89–122.
Youngs, P., & King, M. B. (2002). Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5), 643–670.
Zhan, L. (2023). Leading with passion, purpose, and perseverance. In The Rise of Chinese American Leaders in U.S. Higher Education: Stories and Roadmaps (pp. 331–341). Springer Nature Switzerland.
Zheng, Y., Tang, J., Qian, H., Lu, J., & Cravens, X. C. (2025). Principal succession in China: A scale development and validation study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432251358075.
