Immersion into Mathematics Instruction: An Ethnography on the Development of Problem-Solving Skills by Homogenized Grade 10 Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.652Keywords:
Adaptive Teaching, Clinical Supervision, Ethnographic Research, Grade 10 Learners, Homogenized Classes, Mathematics Instruction, Problem-Solving Skills, Qualitative Research, Self-Regulated LearningAbstract
This study examined the development of mathematical problem-solving skills among homogenized Grade 10 learners of Ramon Magsaysay Cubao High School through immersion in mathematics instruction, considering both teacher and learner perspectives. Anchored on theories related to classroom management, social cognitive learning, self-regulated learning, cognitive load, constructive alignment, and educational effectiveness, the study employed a qualitative ethnographic research design. Data were gathered through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews with four Grade 10 mathematics teachers, focused group discussions with twenty selected learners, lesson plan analysis, and field notes involving approximately 150 learners from four homogenized classes. The findings revealed that mathematics instruction was generally structured, MELC-aligned, and supported by step-by-step explanations, guided practice, questioning, peer interaction, and teacher modeling. However, problem-solving development was limited by fast pacing, formula confusion, anxiety, time pressure, mental blocking, and dependence on teacher or peer support. Learners commonly used strategies such as rereading problems, consulting examples, asking classmates or teachers, using trial-and-error, and seeking digital support. Across immersion cycles, clinical supervision helped teachers improve questioning, pacing, differentiation, conceptual integration, and classroom support, resulting in better learner engagement and gradual improvement in problem-solving participation. The study concludes that strengthening problem-solving skills requires a balance between procedural clarity, conceptual reasoning, emotional support, differentiated instruction, and sufficient thinking time. The study supports SDG 4, Quality Education, by focusing on improved mathematics instruction and learning outcomes, and SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities, by examining learning opportunities across homogenized class groupings. Its sustainability impact lies in promoting educational, institutional, and equity-oriented improvements through responsive teaching, instructional supervision, and inclusive mathematics support.
References
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369
Ashcraft, M. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00196
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. https://books.google.com/books/about/Self_Efficacy.html?id=eJ-PN9g_o-EC
Baroody, A. J. (2003). The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 38(3), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3803_3
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Mindsets matter: How student beliefs shape mathematics learning in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(2), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09665-9
Bernardo, A. B. I., Tan, J., & Ocampo, D. (2022). Rote memorization and problem-solving: Persistent practices in Philippine classrooms. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 55(1), 65–84.
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/processofeducati0000brun
Clores, M. A., & Reganit, M. F. (2020). Assessment practices and student learning in mathematics: Insights from Philippine classrooms. Asia Pacific Social Science Review, 20(2), 1–14.
Cogan, M. L. (1973). Clinical supervision. Houghton Mifflin. https://books.google.com/books/about/Clinical_Supervision.html?id=YlKdAAAAMAAJ
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.
Department of Education. (2020). Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs) with guidelines on the use of MELCs. Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024). https://www.deped.gov.ph/2024/07/23/july-23-2024-do-010-s-2024-policy-guidelines-on-the-implementation-of-the-matatag-curriculum/
Dinglasan, J. A., Ramos, R. J., & Villanueva, M. C. (2023). Realistic mathematics education in Philippine classrooms: Effects on students’ problem-solving skills. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 95(1), 45–62.
DuFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/what-is-a-professional-learning-community
Espinosa, A. A., Bernarte, R. P., & Reyes, M. J. (2023). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ readiness in teaching problem solving: Challenges and opportunities. Philippine Normal University Research Journal, 18(2), 77–95.
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://books.google.com/books/about/Clinical_Supervision.html?id=2jVSAQAAIAAJ
Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester, Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203063538-1
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Lenkeit, J., El Masri, Y., Cantrell, K., Ryan, J., & Baird, J. (2020). Lessons learned from PISA: A systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on the Programme for International Student Assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(3), 333–353.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.
Lester, F. K. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1/2), 245–278.
Luschei, T. F., & Jeong, D. W. (2021). The impact of ability grouping on equity in education: Global perspectives. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 51(2), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1633500
Mayer, R. E. (2002). Mathematical problem solving [ERIC record ED474730]. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474730
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 results: Creative problem solving and mathematical reasoning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8a8ef40e-en
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ogena, E. B., Tan, J., & Magno, C. (2020). Preparing teachers for global competence in mathematics education: The Philippine case. Journal of Teacher Education, 71(5), 518–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120939303
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press. https://archive.org/details/mentalrepresenta0000paiv
Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.193
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press. https://openlibrary.org/works/OL4569830W/How_to_solve_it
Presto, A. G., & Menorca, R. T. (2023). Metacognitive strategy instruction in blended mathematics classrooms. Philippine Journal of Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 101–118.
Republic Act No. 10173, Data Privacy Act of 2012. (2012). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1/2), 9–34.
SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2019). Regional research on student learning outcomes in Southeast Asia. SEAMEO INNOTECH.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/Mind_in_Society.html?id=RxjjUefze_oC
Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 516–551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
