Exploring the Lived Experiences of Teachers and Learners in the Aral Reading Program: A Phenomenological Study

Authors

  • Susan A. Torlao Master Teacher III, Talabaan Elementary School, Zamboanga City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.629

Keywords:

Adaptive Instruction, Aral Reading Program, Classroom Interaction, Literacy Intervention, Phenomenological Study, Reading Comprehension, Self-Efficacy, Teacher-Learner Experience

Abstract

This study explored the lived experiences of teachers and learners in the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Reading Program at Talabaan Elementary School. Anchored on Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the research examined how instructional support, social interaction, and self-efficacy shape literacy development among struggling readers. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews and non-participant classroom observations. The participants included nine teachers and ten learners from Grades 3 to 6 who were purposively selected based on their direct involvement in the program. Data were analyzed thematically using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis procedures. Findings revealed that teachers viewed literacy instruction as a moral responsibility that was both demanding and fulfilling, while learners initially experienced fear and low confidence but gradually developed improved self-esteem and engagement in reading activities. The ARAL Reading Program was implemented through adaptive, learner-centered strategies such as phonics instruction, guided reading, differentiated activities, and the use of multimodal instructional materials. Strong teacher-learner relationships characterized by patience, encouragement, and individualized support were found to be essential in enhancing learner participation and motivation. However, implementation challenges included heavy teacher workload, limited instructional resources, insufficient training opportunities, time constraints, and learner-related difficulties such as decoding struggles, low confidence, and socio-emotional barriers. Despite these challenges, the program was perceived to improve learners’ reading competence, confidence, and long-term educational engagement. Collaboration among teachers, parents, and school stakeholders was identified as crucial for sustaining literacy development. The study aligns with SDG 4 (Quality Education) by promoting inclusive and equitable literacy development, SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) by addressing learning disparities among struggling readers, and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) through the emphasis on collaborative literacy support systems. Its sustainability impact lies in strengthening educational, social, and institutional sustainability by improving foundational literacy skills, enhancing teacher support systems, and fostering community engagement in literacy development.

References

Alvarez, K. G., & Pinto, D. S. (2025). Literacy as a catalyst: Bridging the gap between educational recovery and sustainable development goals in Southeast Asia. Journal of Sustainable Education, 9(1), 112–130.

Bautista, L. M., & Tan, R. C. (2024). Community-based literacy hubs: A study on school-community synergy in Zamboanga City suburban districts. Mindanao Educational Journal, 12(2), 45–59.

Bernardo, A. B. I., Reyes, J. P., & Cuevas, A. L. (2023). Socio-economic barriers and learning trajectories: A regional analysis of reading proficiency in the Southern Philippines. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 17, 1–15.

Brown, T. L., & Garcia, M. A. (2020). Ecosystemic approaches to literacy: Why stakeholder engagement determines program longevity. International Journal of Educational Development, 77, 1022–1035.

Department of Education. (2018). Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI) results. DepEd.

Department of Education. (2025). DepEd Memorandum No. 064, s. 2025: Operational guidelines on the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction. Routledge.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO.

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.

Valdez, P. N. (2023). Systemic barriers in regional literacy: Assessing the responsiveness of the Philippine education system. Asian Education Review, 5(2), 88–104.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Torlao, S. (2026). Exploring the Lived Experiences of Teachers and Learners in the Aral Reading Program: A Phenomenological Study. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 3738-3745. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.629