Assessment of Science Laboratory Resources in Public High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.599Keywords:
Assessment, CAMAG Districts, Educational Qualifications, Laboratory Training, Laboratory Utilization, Public High Schools, Science Laboratory ResourcesAbstract
This study assessed the science laboratory resources in public secondary schools in the CAMAG districts of Bohol Division during School Year 2025–2026. Anchored on Human Capital Theory and Diffusion of Innovation Theory, the study examined the availability, functionality, and extent of utilization of DepEd-provided laboratory resources, as well as the relationship between laboratory utilization and teachers’ educational qualifications, years of science teaching experience, and laboratory-related training attendance. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, involving 65 science teacher-participants selected through total enumeration. Data were gathered using a researcher-made survey questionnaire and semi-structured interview guide. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and Spearman correlation, while qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings showed that most laboratory resources were generally available and functional, but physics and STEM chemistry resources were limited, and several resources across integrated science, chemistry, physics, SHS Core, STEM chemistry, and STEM physics were underutilized. Educational attainment had a significant but small positive relationship with laboratory utilization, while years of science teaching experience and laboratory-related training showed strong positive relationships. Low utilization was attributed to inadequate and misaligned laboratory infrastructure, insufficient teacher skills and training, limited time for laboratory activities, and curriculum–laboratory misalignment. The study recommends upgrading laboratory resources, strengthening specialized laboratory training, aligning curriculum requirements with laboratory activities, and providing sufficient time for laboratory work. The study supports SDG 4—Quality Education by promoting improved science learning environments and teacher capacity. Its sustainability impact lies in strengthening educational, institutional, governance, and innovation sustainability through better laboratory management, resource utilization, and science instruction.
References
Aban, J. (2017). Triangulation on science instructors’ demographic profile, teachers’ competence and students’ academic performance. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.11751.46245
Alerta, M. B., Florendo, R. A. A., Salvado, C. M. B., Gonzales, S. M., Camomot, K. D. G., & Galarpe, V. R. K. (2017). Students’ perception of physics laboratory equipment in the University of Science and Technology of Southern Philippines. Science International, 29, 777–781.
Arnejo, Y. M., Bance, J. M., Cagaanan, M. A., Cloma, F. F. M., Co, E. J., Lacambra, L. G., ... Ventura, P. (2021). Perception of students on the functionality of science laboratories. ResearchGate. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31687.01442
Atud, F. M. R., Cabrera, R. M., & Calzada, M. P. T. (2025). Teachers’ profile, knowledge competence, and skill competence in laboratory instruction: Its implications to physics teaching. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(4), 2059–2069. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.04.33
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
Bello, T. O. (2012). Effect of availability and utilization of physics laboratory equipment on students’ academic achievement in senior secondary school physics. World Journal of Education, 2(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v2n5p1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Caballes, M. E. J., Pedrita, N. J. C., Villaren, J. M., & Diquito, T. J. A. (2024). Status of science laboratories in secondary basic education public schools in the Division of Davao del Sur, Philippines. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation, 3(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajiri.v3i1.2495
Cabusor, S. M., & Antonio, V. V. (2025). Availability, accessibility, and teachers’ utilization of science laboratory resources in public secondary schools of Ilocos Norte. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(3), 1478–1493. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.03.33
DeFeo, D. J., Bibler, A., & Gerken, S. (2020). The effect of a paired lab on course completion and grades in nonmajors introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), Article ar36. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-03-0041
Demandante, R. A. M., & Lagura, R. T. (2026). A systematic review of laboratory implementation in the Philippines. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 5(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajmri.v5i2.6422
Department of Education. (2006). DO 48, s. 2006: Observance of safety measures in science laboratories. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2006/11/30/do-48-s-2006-observance-of-safety-measures-in-science-laboratories/
Department of Education. (2009). DO 118, s. 2009: Prescribing the list of science and mathematics equipment, laboratory glassware and consumables for all year levels of elementary and secondary science subjects. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2009/12/15/do-118-s-2009-prescribing-the-list-of-science-and-mathematics-equipment-laboratory-glassware-and-consumables-for-all-year-levels-of-elementary-and-secondary-science-subjects/
Department of Education. (2010). DO 55, s. 2010: Policies and guidelines on strengthening science and mathematics education at the secondary level. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2010/05/17/do-55-s-2010-policies-and-guidelines-on-strengthening-science-and-matematics-education-at-the-secondary-level/
Department of Education. (2013). DO 38, s. 2013: Guidelines on the utilization of support fund for schools implementing the Science, Technology and Engineering Program. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/DO_s2013_38.pdf
Department of Education. (2017). DO 17, s. 2017: Guidelines on the provision of science and mathematics equipment for Grades 4–6 pupils in public elementary schools and Grades 11–12 students in public senior high schools. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/04/07/do-17-s-2017-guidelines-on-the-provision-of-science-and-mathematics-equipment-for-grades-4-6-pupils-in-public-elementary-schools-and-grades-11-12-students-in-public-senior-high-sch/
Doncillo, D., & Justo, A. (2025). Pedagogical skills through laboratory-based instruction and its relations to the current status of the science laboratory facilities. Aloysian Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, Education, and Allied Fields, 1(7), 8–53. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16208180
Duban, N., Aydoğdu, B., & Yüksel, A. (2019). Classroom teachers’ opinions on science laboratory practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 772–780. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070317
Harman, G., Cokelez, A., Dal, B., & Alper, U. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ views on laboratory applications in science education: The effect of a two-semester course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040103
Hussen Seid, M., Assefa, Y., Legas Muhammed, B., Moges, B. T., Tsehay Birhanu, E., Fentaw, Y., Ahmed Tilwani, S., & Reshid Ahmed, M. (2022). Students’ and teachers’ perception and practice towards laboratory work in chemistry teaching-learning: Evidence from secondary schools in North Wollo Zone, Ethiopia. Education Research International, 2022, Article 7254105. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7254105
Issah, I., Baalongbuoro, V., & Oware, S. A. (2023). The impact of laboratory practical activities on students’ academic performance at Queen of Peace Senior High School in the Nadowli-Kaleo District of the Upper West Region of Ghana. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 11(3), 2727–2739. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v11i03.el2
Kamba, A. H., Libata, I. A., & Usman, A. (2019). Lack of availability of science teaching facilities on students teaching and learning science in some selected secondary schools in Kebbi State, Nigeria. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.21276/jaep.2019.3.7.1
Kaminski, J. (2011). Diffusion of innovation theory. Canadian Journal of Nursing Informatics, 6(2). https://cjni.net/journal/?p=1444
Keskin Geçer, A., & Zengin, R. (2015). Science teachers’ attitudes towards laboratory practises and problems encountered. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(11). https://ijern.com/journal/2015/November-2015/12.pdf
Kevin, L., & Evans, E. (2024). Laboratory and library facilities: Investigating their potentials in promoting students’ interests and performances in science subjects. GASPRO International Journal of Eminent Scholars, 11(1). https://www.globalacademicstar.com/download/article/laboratory-and-library-facilities-investigating-their-potencies-in-promoting-students-interests-and-performances-in-science-subjects.pdf
Kumari, P., Mwesigye, A., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2024). Science laboratory education and students’ perceived behavior towards science education: A review. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 8(4), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.59765/pws538jgt
Marasigan, A. C., & Abas, H. T. H. (2025). Readiness of science laboratory facilities of the public junior high school in Lanao del Sur, Philippines. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5075822
McConnell, C. R., Brue, S. L., & Macpherson, D. A. (2009). Contemporary labor economics (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mogaka, M. M. (2019). Availability and utilization of physics laboratory equipment on academic achievement of students in public day secondary schools. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 3(8). https://rsisinternational.org/virtual-library/papers/availability-and-utilization-physics-laboratory-equipment-on-academic-achievement-of-students-in-public-day-secondary-schools/
Nisa’i, K., Chandri, F., Faizah, F., Zaenaf, S., Aulia, F., & Hidayah, N. (2024). The role of science teachers in inspiring the younger generation: Improving the quality and competence of science teachers. Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education, 3(2), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v3i2.3384
Nuesca, F. (2025). Materials management of science laboratories in public high schools in La Union. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.411
Oriel, Q. A., Labay, P. M., & Manoos-Pacia, L. M. (2026, March). Status of science laboratory and academic performance in science of Grade 10 learners in public secondary schools in Gumaca East and West Districts, Division of Quezon: Basis for TQM-based science laboratory development plan.
Oyelowo, P. O. (2023). Impact of availability and utilization of functional laboratories on students’ attitude in secondary school physics in Nigeria. Journal of Science, Technology and Mathematics Pedagogy, 1(1), 233–241.
Palomar, B. C., Manicio, M. T. C., Reyes, A. S., Anudin, A. G., Jocosn, J. V., Alcausin, F. B., Belza, D. S. G., Tuazon, M. M. M., Flugencio, M. S. B., & Rodil, J. M. C. (2025). Profiling study of teacher education institutions and teacher educators. EDCOM 2. https://www.edcom2.gov.ph
Pareek, R. B. (2019). An assessment of availability and utilization of laboratory facilities for teaching science at secondary level. Science Education International, 30(1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1209309.pdf
Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2025, July 17). Teacher training misaligned with classroom needs—PIDS. https://pids.gov.ph/details/news/press-releases/teacher-training-misaligned-with-classroom-needs-pids-2
Prudente, M. S., Garcia, J. A. S., Mistades, V. M., Roleda, L. S., & Talau, F. T. (2024). Systematic review of professional development programs for teachers in the Philippines. EDCOM 2. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/18_Prudente-et-al-Systematic-Review-of-Professional-1.pdf
Quinatac-an, Y., Quinatac-an, F., & Castino, J. (2025). Feasibility study on the conversion of the existing special science curriculum to Science, Technology, and Engineering (STE) Program at Silway-8 National High School. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9, 3790–3809. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0273
Remigio, J. M. F., Antonio, V. V., & Calzada, M. P. T. (2025). Physics teachers’ competence and extent of use of laboratory approaches. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 6(5), 2556–2568. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.05.31
Remperas, R. N., & Calzada, M. P. T. (2025). Teachers’ challenges and best practices on laboratory approaches in science teaching. International Journal of Science, Architecture, Technology and Environment. https://doi.org/10.63680/ijsate0525117.130
Rivera, M., & Manalastas, A. (2025). Exploring science teachers’ competence and laboratory management capability on students’ basic science process skills. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6, 2225–2235. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V6ISSUE1/IJRPR37822.pdf
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2024). Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education: EDCOM II year one report. https://edcom2.gov.ph/media/2024/02/EDCOM-II-Year-One-Report-PDF-022924.pdf
Second Congressional Commission on Education. (2026). Turning point: A decade of necessary reform (2026–2035). https://edcom2.gov.ph
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 31–62). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4
Supriyatman, S., Kade, A., Darmadi, I. W., Miftah, M., Supriyadi, S., & Ismail, I. (2024). Competence of junior high schools’ science teachers in implementing laboratory teaching: A case study on Palu, Centre Celebes. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 3114–3122. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.7510
Villaran, R. (2023). Building scientific capability: Understanding science teachers’ experiences and perceptions in using DepEd science equipment. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10504518
Wuttaphan, N. (2017). Human capital theory: The theory of human resource development, implications, and future. Life Sciences and Environment Journal, 18(2), 240–253.
