Synchronizing Metrics and Malasakit: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study of Transnational Filipino Special Education Teachers in the United States

Authors

  • Rosemie Duhaylunsod Chavez University of Nueva Caceres, Naga City, Camarines Sur 4400, Philippines Author
  • Maria Luisa B. Archivido University of Nueva Caceres, Naga City, Camarines Sur 4400, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.563

Keywords:

Bicultural Competence, Cultural Identity, Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Filipino SPED Teachers, Hybrid Pedagogy, Immigrant Teachers, Pedagogical Practice, Professional Adaptation, Special Education, United States Education System

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between cultural identity and pedagogical practice through the lived experiences of Filipino Special Education (SPED) teachers in the United States. Anchored on Cultural Identity Theory, Sociocultural Theory, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, and Transactional Theory, the study examined how Filipino educators negotiated their cultural values, professional roles, instructional practices, and workplace interactions in multicultural U.S. school settings. A qualitative phenomenological research design was employed using Moustakas’s modified Van Kaam method. Six Filipino SPED teachers actively teaching in U.S. public or private schools participated in the study. Data were gathered virtually through semi-structured, in-depth interviews guided by a researcher-developed and expert-validated interview guide. The findings revealed five major themes: cultural identity and its influence on teaching, challenges in cultural adaptation and workplace communication, shifts in instructional practices to meet U.S. educational expectations, relationship-building with students and colleagues from diverse backgrounds, and professional and personal growth. Filipino values such as malasakit, bayanihan, pakikipagkapwa, compassion, patience, resilience, and respect shaped classroom management, instructional decisions, student engagement, and professional relationships. However, participants also experienced challenges related to communication differences, cultural adjustment, behavioral expectations, documentation requirements, and adaptation to student-centered, evidence-based, and data-informed instruction. The study concluded that Filipino SPED teachers developed hybrid pedagogical identities by blending Filipino relational values with U.S. special education practices, resulting in inclusive and supportive learning environments. The study recommends culturally responsive professional development, mentorship, intercultural communication support, collaborative professional communities, and institutional recognition of immigrant teachers’ cultural contributions. The study aligns with SDG 4, Quality Education, and SDG 10, Reduced Inequalities, by supporting inclusive education and recognizing the professional contributions of immigrant teachers. Its sustainability impact is primarily educational, institutional, and social, as it promotes culturally responsive teaching, teacher well-being, professional retention, and equitable learning environments.

References

Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

Brazas, I. D. (2023). Migration of special education teachers: A phenomenological study. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 39(4), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2023/v39i4861

Carver-Thomas, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2019). The trouble with teacher turnover: How teacher attrition affects students and schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(36). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3699

Collier, M. J., & Thomas, M. (1988). Cultural identity: An interpretive perspective. In Y. Y. Kim & W. B. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication (pp. 99–120). SAGE Publications.

Côté, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Psychology Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

David, E. J. R. (2010). Brown skin, white minds: Filipino-/American postcolonial psychology. Information Age Publishing.

Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.09.002

Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2023). Inclusive practices in today’s schools: A practical guide for classroom teachers (9th ed.). Pearson.

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gudykunst, W. B. (2004). Bridging differences: Effective intergroup communication (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Guo, S. (2013). The changing face of work and learning in the context of immigration: The Canadian experience. Journal of Education and Work, 26(2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2011.630657

Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465

Lee, J. S. (2017). Immigrant teachers in U.S. schools: Navigating cultural and professional identities. Multilingual Matters.

Legayada, J. F. L., & Villarente, S. V. D. (2025). Cross-cultural experiences of Filipino special education teachers in the USA. International Journal of Advanced Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 11(6), 794–804.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.

Oca, J. B. D., & Malaga, R. S. (2025). The diaspora of Filipino teachers leaving their home country for work in the United States. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 9(5), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v9i5.6811

Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Southern Illinois University Press.

Santoro, N. (2015). The drive to diversify the teaching profession: Narrow assumptions, hidden complexities. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(6), 858–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2013.835433

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Soriano, F. I. (2016). Cultural identity and intercultural communication in educational settings. In S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, & V. L. Vignoles (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 1–20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3656-7_11

Suárez-Orozco, M. M., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Sattin-Bajaj, C. (2010). Making migration work. Peabody Journal of Education, 85(4), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2010.518053

Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chavez, R., & Archivido, M. L. (2026). Synchronizing Metrics and Malasakit: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study of Transnational Filipino Special Education Teachers in the United States. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 3191-3197. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.563