Instructional Approaches in Science Education Across Eastern Tabuk District: Issues and Innovations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.562Keywords:
Eastern Tabuk District; Enrichment Activities; Instructional Approaches; Science Education; Science InstructionAbstract
This study determined the instructional approaches used in teaching Science in the public secondary schools across Eastern Tabuk District during School Year 2025-2026. It examined the profile of Science teacher-respondents, the extent of realization of the general objectives of Science instruction, the effectiveness of teaching parameters, the hindrances encountered by teachers, and the enrichment activities used to address these concerns. The study used a descriptive-survey design with 19 Science teachers as respondents. Data were gathered through a validated questionnaire and unstructured interviews, and were analyzed using frequency counts, percentages, and weighted mean. Findings revealed that most respondents were young, female, married, Teacher I or Teacher II, and Science majors. The general objectives of Science instruction were realized, with an average weighted mean of 4.08. Teaching parameters were rated effective for school heads (3.87), teachers (4.16), students (3.72), parents (4.16), and stakeholders (4.06). Hindrances were slightly serious, with a grand weighted mean of 2.50; student-related concerns were the most serious, particularly absenteeism, unwise use of leisure time, lack of self-confidence, and inability to express ideas. Enrichment activities were often used, with an average weighted mean of 4.15. The study concludes that Science instruction in Eastern Tabuk District is effective, yet learner-centered intervention, stronger instructional supervision, parental engagement, and continuous teacher development remain necessary to improve Science learning outcomes.
References
Baig, M. I., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2023). Flipped classroom in higher education: A systematic literature review and research challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00430-5
Ballarta, L. V., Illescas, C. M., Perez, D. R., & Hamora, L. A. (2022). School-based management level of practice in selected public elementary schools in MIMAROPA Region, Philippines. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 8, 134-146. https://www.zienjournals.com/index.php/jpip/article/view/1672
Buhl-Wiggers, J., La Cour, L., Franck, M. S., & Kjaergaard, A. (2023). Investigating effects of teachers in the flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial study of classroom level heterogeneity. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00396-4
Campillo-Ferrer, J. M., & Miralles-Martinez, P. (2021). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom model on students' self-reported motivation and learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 176. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00860-4
Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students' learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 793-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications.
Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Science. Pasig City, Philippines: Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/
Hardiansyah, F., & Rasia, M. (2022). Enhancing students' learning motivation through changing seats in primary school. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(1), 253-268. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbarsd.v9i1.43002
Ismail, S., Muhammad, S., Omar, M. N., & Raman, A. (2020). The great challenge of Malaysian school leaders' instructional leadership: Can it affect teachers' functional competency across 21st-century education? Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2436-2443. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080627
Lara, L., & Saracostti, M. (2019). Effect of parental involvement on children's academic achievement in Chile. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01464
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ribeiro, L. M., Cunha, R. S., Silva, M. C. A. E., Carvalho, M., & Vital, M. L. (2021). Parental involvement during pandemic times: Challenges and opportunities. Education Sciences, 11(6), 302. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060302
Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, K., Moore, C., Chimonidou, A., Labrake, C., & Kopp, S. (2023). Do inquiring minds have positive attitudes? The Science education of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(6), 613-635. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2023.2184844
Samadi, F., Jafarigohar, M., Saeedi, M., Ganji, M., & Khodabandeh, F. (2024). Impact of flipped classroom on EFL learners' self-regulated learning and higher-order thinking skills during the Covid-19 pandemic. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9, 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00246-w
Sims, S., Fletcher-Wood, H., O'Mara-Eves, A., Cottingham, S., Stansfield, C., Van Herwegen, J., & Anders, J. (2021). What are the characteristics of teacher professional development that increase pupil achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Education Endowment Foundation. https://tinyurl.com/TeacherPDReview2021
Susanti, S., Wardiah, D., & Lian, B. (2020). Effect of academic supervision of school heads and school culture on quality teaching teachers. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 20(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.52155/ijpsat.v20.1.1715
Susiani, K., Dharsana, I. K., Suartama, I. K., Suranata, K., & Yasa, I. N. (2022). Student motivation and independent learning in social studies, English, and Math: The impact of the classroom environment. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 5(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v5i4.681
Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., Chambwe, N., Cintron, D. L., Cooper, J. D., Dunster, G., Grummer, J. A., Hennessey, K., Hsiao, J., Iranon, N., Jones, L., Jordt, H., Keller, M., Lacey, M. E., Littlefield, C. E., Lowe, A., Newman, S., Okolo, V., Olroyd, S., Peecook, B. R., Pickett, S. B., Slager, D. L., Caviedes-Solis, I. W., Stanchak, K. E., Sundaravardan, V., Valdebenito, C., Williams, C. R., Zinsli, K., & Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476-6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. Paris, France: UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
