Instructional and Professional Experiences of Multigrade Teachers

Authors

  • Ma. Jonina J. Valeria-Mayola Bukidnon State University, Graduate School, Malaybalay City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.490

Keywords:

Classroom Management, Differentiated Instruction, Multigrade Classes, Professional Advancement, Resource Scarcity, Self-Efficacy, Time Management, Transcendental Phenomenology

Abstract

This study explored the instructional and professional experiences of multigrade teachers in the Division of Malaybalay City during the 2025–2026 school year. Anchored on Differentiated Instruction Theory by Tomlinson and Bandura’s Self-Efficacy Theory, the study examined how multigrade teachers adapt instructional practices and develop professionally while handling multiple grade levels in one classroom. Using a qualitative transcendental phenomenological design by Moustakas (1994), the study involved six purposively selected multigrade teachers from public elementary schools. Data were gathered through validated semi-structured interviews conducted in three sessions per participant and analyzed using thematic analysis. Findings revealed that multigrade teachers constantly adjusted instruction to address learners’ varied needs, abilities, and learning paces through differentiated activities, flexible grouping, and adaptive teaching strategies. Teachers also experienced resource scarcity, overcrowded classrooms, and limited instructional materials, yet sustained instruction through creativity, improvisation, and resilience. Another major challenge involved managing multiple grade levels within limited instructional time, requiring structured routines, prioritization of essential competencies, and effective time management. In terms of professional advancement, teachers developed greater confidence, competence, resilience, and self-efficacy through repeated teaching experiences, collaboration with colleagues, Learning Action Cell (LAC) sessions, trainings, and professional development activities. The study concluded that multigrade teaching is a continuous process of adaptation, collaboration, and professional growth that demands flexibility, commitment, and learner-centered instruction. The study recommended strengthening professional development, instructional supervision, resource provision, and institutional support for multigrade teachers and schools. The findings support Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education) by promoting inclusive and equitable learning opportunities, particularly for learners in remote and underserved communities. The study also contributes to sustainable educational development by supporting teacher resilience, instructional effectiveness, and equitable access to quality education in marginalized areas.

References

Badol, M. (2025). Teaching linguistic segments in multigrade classrooms: The case of reading teachers in Suyo District. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.06.06.33

Bagay, J. (2025). Challenges and adaptive strategies into the multifaceted experiences of multigrade teachers: A phenomenological study. AIDE Interdisciplinary Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.56648/aide-irj.v10i1.164

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.

Barbetta, G., Chuard-Keller, P., Sorrenti, G., & Turati, G. (2023). Good or bad? Understanding the effects over time of multigrading on child achievement. Economics of Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102442

Bisaya, L., & Ngilangil, K. (2025). Challenges of multi-grade teachers in ESL: Basis for the proposed enhanced capacity for multigrade ESL teaching. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330903

Brecio, R. (2023). Lifeworld of multigrade teachers in Leyte: A phenomenological study. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.2.593

Chan, J., Marasigan, A., & Santander, N. (2021). Multigrade teachers’ experiences and learning assessments on modular remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research Studies in Education. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2021.6

Department of Education. (1997). DepEd Order No. 96, s. 1997: Policies and guidelines in the organization and operation of multigrade classes. Department of Education, Philippines.

Department of Education. (2009). DepEd Order No. 81, s. 2009: Strengthening the implementation of multigrade education in Philippine education. Department of Education, Philippines.

Department of Education. (2021). DepEd Order No. 36, s. 2021: Program support fund for multigrade schools and teachers. Department of Education, Philippines.

Dontogan, T., Lunio-Toctocan, C., Ricardo, K., & Saldo, M. (2024). Inclusive pedagogy: Systematic review on exploring stakeholder engagement in multigrade classroom teaching. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2024.v04i04.015

Hussain, M., & Akhter, N. (2025). Enhancing teacher performance and educational environments in special education institutions: A study of challenges and opportunities in Pakistan. The Critical Review of Social Sciences Studies. https://doi.org/10.59075/c3b55h48

Kalender, B., & Erdem, E. (2021). Challenges faced by classroom teachers in multigrade classrooms: A case study. Journal of Pedagogical Research. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.2021473490

Marasigan, A. (2025). Multigrade teachers’ experiences and learning assessments on modular remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5075859

Medequillo, A., & Gallardo, R. (2024). Multigrade teachers in rural areas: Thoughts to ponder. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jun026

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.

Naparan, G., & Alinsug, V. (2020). Classroom strategies of multigrade teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3651296

Naparan, G., & MaEd, I. (2021). Challenges and coping strategies of multi-grade teachers. International Journal of Theory and Application in Elementary and Secondary Education, 3, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijtaese.v3i1.510

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1

Rondero, C., & Casupanan, I. (2024). Challenges and opportunities in multigrade teaching: Experiences of primary school teachers in far-flung schools. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.12.19

Shareefa, M. (2020). Using differentiated instruction in multigrade classes: A case of a small school. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1749559

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Urma, C., & Callo, E. (2023). Pedagogical challenges and teaching practices of multigrade teachers in rural public elementary schools. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.1012.16017

Downloads

Published

2026-05-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Valeria-Mayola, M. J. (2026). Instructional and Professional Experiences of Multigrade Teachers. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 2629-2635. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.490