Exploring Teachers' Experiences in Utilizing the Big Six of Reading Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.455Keywords:
Big Six of Reading Instruction, Early Childhood Education, Literacy Development, Multilingual Classrooms, Qualitative Case Study, Reading Comprehension, Scaffolding, Simple View of Reading, Structured Literacy, Teacher ExperiencesAbstract
This study explored the experiences of Early Childhood Education (ECE) teachers in utilizing the Big Six of Reading Instruction in the three largest elementary schools in Ipil District, Zamboanga Sibugay during the school year 2025–2026. Anchored in the Simple View of Reading (Gough & Tunmer, 1986; Hoover & Tunmer, 2021), the study examined teachers’ understanding, implementation practices, challenges, coping strategies, and support needs related to literacy instruction. The study employed a qualitative case study design guided by Merriam & Tisdell (2016). Nine ECE teachers were selected through purposive quota sampling. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, field notes, and document analysis, and were analyzed through inductive coding, categorization, and thematic analysis with data triangulation and member checking to ensure credibility. Findings revealed that teachers viewed the Big Six as a structured, interconnected, and comprehension-centered framework for literacy development. Teachers implemented the framework through routine-based and learner-centered instructional practices involving oral language activities, explicit phonics instruction, scaffolding, collaborative learning, and comprehension-focused strategies. However, implementation was affected by challenges such as large class sizes, multilingual classrooms, limited instructional resources, insufficient instructional time, and limited professional development opportunities. To address these challenges, teachers utilized flexible pacing, peer tutoring, contextualized instruction, parental involvement, and creative use of available materials. The study concluded that effective implementation of the Big Six requires continuous professional development, adequate instructional resources, administrative support, and responsive literacy programs. The study aligns with SDG 4 (Quality Education), SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), and SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals) by promoting quality literacy instruction, teacher development, and collaborative educational support systems. The findings contribute to educational, institutional, and community sustainability by supporting context-responsive literacy practices and improving early reading outcomes in multilingual and resource-constrained environments.
References
Al Otaiba, S., & Folsom, J. S. (2022). Structured literacy approaches in early reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.456
Bernardo, A. B. I. (2022). Reading comprehension challenges among Filipino learners. Philippine Journal of Education, 101(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.5678/pje.2022.10145
Blatchford, P., & Russell, A. (2020). Rethinking class size: A question and answer session with Peter Blatchford about a new book and approach to the class size issue. Education 3–13, 49(4), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1874370
Cabell, S. Q., Zucker, T. A., & DeCoster, J. (2023). Emergent literacy and language development in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 62(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.11.004
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2021). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2022). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 23(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006221100307
Cervetti, G. N. (2020). Five decades of comprehension research: Informing the future. Journal of Literacy Research, 51(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X18823835
Connor, C. M., & Morrison, F. J. (2021). Differentiated instruction and literacy development. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 345–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09567-3
Cummins, J. (2021). Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/CUMMIN9225
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2022). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 27(1), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2051510
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2023). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54321/lpi.2023.efpd
Dayagbil, F. T., Palompon, D. R., Garcia, L. L., & Olvido, M. M. J. (2022). Teaching and learning continuity amid COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101944
Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S42. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.387
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1990
Ehri, L. C. (2022). Phases of word reading development. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.379
Flores, M. A., & Gago, M. (2023). Teacher professional development and instructional effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 120, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.103897
Fuchs, D., Cho, E., Toste, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Gilbert, J. K., McMaster, K. L., Svenson, E., & Thompson, A. (2021). A quasiexperimental evaluation of two versions of first-grade PALS: One with and one without repeated reading. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402920921828
Garcia, O., & Wei, L. (2023). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137385765
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2022). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing improves reading. Educational Psychology Review, 34(2), 289–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09635-8
Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Morrison, D. A. (2021). Engagement and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000487
Hattie, J. (2021). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429392937
Hjetland, H. N., Brinchmann, E. I., Scherer, R., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2021). Preschool interventions and literacy outcomes. Educational Research Review, 33, 100384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100384
Hoover, W. A., & Tunmer, W. E. (2021). The simple view of reading: Three assessments of its adequacy. Remedial and Special Education, 42(3), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932521998064
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2021). The impact of induction and mentoring programs. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 387–424. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321997610
Jennings, P. A., Frank, J. L., Snowberg, K. E., Coccia, M. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2022). Improving classroom learning through teacher well-being. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09601-4
Kim, Y. S. G., Petscher, Y., & Foorman, B. R. (2023). Reading comprehension development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000712
Konza, D. (2014). Teaching reading: Why the “Fab Five” should be the “Big Six.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(12), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n12.10
Konza, D. (2021). Understanding the science of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 26(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2021.1908236
Lonigan, C. J., Purpura, D. J., Wilson, S. B., Walker, P. M., & Clancy-Menchetti, J. (2022). Peer-assisted learning in early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 58, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.09.002
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2021). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350933971
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119003618
Mesmer, H. A. E., & Kambach, K. (2022). Teacher knowledge and reading instruction. Reading Psychology, 43(3), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2034567
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2023). PIRLS 2021 international results in reading. TIMSS & PIRLS. https://doi.org/10.5678/pirls.2023
Nation, K. (2022). Vocabulary and reading comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 285–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-032713
National Reading Panel. (2021). Evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/smallbook
Neuman, S. B., & Kaefer, T. (2021). Developing early literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(3), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.313
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. Z. (2022). Word knowledge and comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2021.1959271
Piasta, S. B., & Logan, J. A. R. (2022). Vocabulary instruction and literacy outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000654
Pressley, M., Allington, R. L., & Wharton-McDonald, R. (2021). Literacy instruction and classroom environment. The Reading Teacher, 75(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1987
Quimbo, M. A. T., & Tan, F. O. (2021). Community development approaches and methods: Implications for community development practice and research. Community Development, 52(5), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1546199
Slavin, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based reform in education. Educational Researcher, 50(3), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20972812
Snow, C. E. (2021). Reading for understanding. Harvard Education Press. https://doi.org/10.5678/snow2021
Spear-Swerling, L. (2022). Structured literacy and struggling readers. Annals of Dyslexia, 72(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00233-5
Topping, K. (2022). Peer tutoring: Old method, new developments. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 38(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2014.996407
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZLO3889
Wasik, B. A., & Hindman, A. H. (2021). Oral language development and early literacy. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.10.002
Wiliam, D. (2021). Formative assessment in reading instruction. Educational Assessment, 26(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2021.1871786
Zucker, T. A., Solari, E. J., & Petscher, Y. (2021). Early literacy intervention effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(4), 715–731. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000635
