Effects Of the Sign Dominance and Distance (SDD) Technique on Students’ Performance in Integer Operation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.447Keywords:
Addition of Integers, Cognitive Performance, Constructivist Theory, Integer Operations, Mathematics Education, Sign Dominance and Distance Technique, Subtraction of IntegersAbstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of the Sign Dominance and Distance (SDD) Technique in improving Grade 7 students’ performance in integer operations, particularly addition and subtraction of integers, at Calamba National Comprehensive High School during the School Year 2025–2026. Anchored on Constructivist Theory, the study addressed the persistent conceptual difficulties learners experience in understanding negative numbers and abstract integer operations. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design was employed involving 72 Grade 7 students divided into experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught using the SDD Technique, while the control group received Traditional Instruction. Data were gathered using a researcher-constructed 30-item Cognitive Performance Test validated by mathematics experts and tested for reliability using the Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20). Mean, standard deviation, independent sample t-test, and Cohen’s d were utilized in analyzing the data. Findings revealed that both groups initially demonstrated low proficiency in integer operations, particularly in subtraction. After the intervention, both groups improved; however, the experimental group achieved significantly higher posttest performance and demonstrated greater internal growth compared to the control group. The SDD Technique was particularly effective in improving addition of integers and enhancing conceptual understanding through visual and relational reasoning. Although subtraction remained challenging, the experimental group still demonstrated substantial improvement. The study concluded that the SDD Technique is a more effective instructional strategy than traditional rule-based methods in improving procedural fluency and conceptual understanding in integer operations. The findings support the integration of conceptually grounded and visually supported instructional approaches in mathematics education. The study aligns with SDG 4 – Quality Education by promoting effective and inclusive mathematics instruction and supports SDG 9 – Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure through the development of innovative teaching strategies. The study also contributes to educational and institutional sustainability by strengthening mathematical competence, improving instructional practices, and supporting evidence-based curriculum development.
References
Ashman, G. (2021). Cognitive load theory in action. John Catt Educational.
Ayebale, L., Habyarimana, J. D., & Mugabo, K. (2026). Factors affecting students' achievement in mathematics in secondary schools in developing countries: A rapid systematic review. ResearchGate.
Basilio, J., et al. (2023). Assessing students’ mastery and misconceptions in the fundamental operations on integers.
Burns, M. K., et al. (2025). Meta-analysis of procedural fluency and magnitude-based reasoning in integer operations. Journal of Numerical Cognition.
Center for Mathematical Cognition. (2026). Spatial-numerical mapping and the expansion of the mental number line in secondary learners. CMC Press.
Cho, & Lee. (2023). Explicit justifications for procedural steps in middle school mathematics.
Dela Cruz, M. (2023). Numeracy gaps in rural Philippine secondary schools: A policy review. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Dube, & Robinson. (2018). Procedural learning and conceptual analysis in integer operations.
Frontiers in Psychology. (2026). Visualizations during arithmetic tasks hamper performance and increase cognitive load: An fNIRS study. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 102.
Grenell, A., Butts, J. R., Levine, S. C., & Fyfe, E. R. (2024). Children’s confidence on mathematical equivalence and fraction problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 246, 106003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106003
Gusenbauer, M., & Gauster, H. (2025). Magnitude-based reasoning: A systematic review. Contemporary Educational Research.
Hansen, T., et al. (2024). Metacognitive monitoring and procedural choice in signed number operations. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Harun, N. A., Cuevas, K. G., Asakil, O., Alviar, J., & Solon, L. J. (2023). Assessing students’ mastery and misconceptions in the fundamental operations on integers. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 3(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.53378/353000
Hassan, & Zaini. (2022). Decoupling number direction from magnitude in student errors.
Heffington, J., et al. (2023). Innovative teaching strategies in mathematics education. MDPI Education Sciences.
IERJ. (2025). Cognitive load theory in mathematics learning: A comprehensive review for school-level application. International Education and Research Journal, 11(4), 55–62.
Jupri, Gozali, & Usodo. (2021). Systematic errors and the additive inverse conceptual anchor.
Khalid, & Embong. (2019/2020). Sources and causes of misconceptions in integer operations.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2025). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Updated ed.). National Academies Press.
Kwok, F. Y., Wilkey, E. D., Peters, L., Khiu, E., Bull, R., Lee, K., & Ansari, D. (2023). Developmental dyscalculia is not associated with atypical brain activation: A univariate fMRI study of arithmetic, magnitude processing, and visuospatial working memory. Human Brain Mapping, 44(18), 6308–6325. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26495
Küçüktaş, S., & St. Jacques, P. L. (2025). The impact of psychological distance on abstract thinking. Memory & Cognition.
Li, Yuen, & Lau. (2020). Self-explanation and knowledge acquisition in mathematics.
Marrero, & Frantz. (2023). Relational understanding of equivalence in integer subtraction.
McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2024). The “freed resources” mechanism in algorithms. Journal of Numerical Cognition.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2025). The strands of mathematical proficiency: Conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. The National Academies Press.
OECD. (2023). PISA results regarding deep-seated conceptual hurdles in mathematics.
Pajot, A., et al. (2025). Dissociation of size and distance effect in numerical magnitude. PMC PubMed Central.
Pandey. (2017). Integer operations as a foundation for higher mathematics.
Pariño, K. R., Canoy, M. V., & Augusto, M. I. (2025). Navigating the challenges: Students' skills and confusion in integer operations. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i12.6451
Philippine E-Journals. (2021). Enhancing the basic operation performance in integers through the use of Krypto Games. Apad National High School Research Journal.
Park, & Han. (2024). Minimizing cognitive complexity in middle school instructional materials.
Ramos, L., et al. (2021). Pedagogical approaches to numerical thinking. Journal of Basic Education Research.
RePEc. (2024). Strategic intervention report: Grade 7 integer performance. Economic and Educational Policy Review.
Santos, A. R. (2022). Peer-tutoring and procedural mastery in Junior High School Mathematics (Unpublished master’s thesis).
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load theory and instructional design.
Tan, L., & Nguyen, H. (2025). Retention of mathematical procedures: A longitudinal comparison of rote vs. logic-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Tunc-Pekkan. (2021). Simulating movement on a number line for integer directionality.
Villarreal, J. C., & Tan, E. (2024). Cognitive load and math anxiety: Implications for the MATATAG curriculum. Journal of Philippine Education Reform.
Vlassis, J. (2002). The role of the number line in reconciling abstract negative numbers.
Vosniadou, S., et al. (2025). International handbook of research on conceptual change (Updated ed.). Routledge.
Zuhriawan, A., et al. (2024). A didactical transposition study on secondary students' number sense of integers. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1739073
