The Effectiveness of Chunking Technique on the Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills of College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I1.37Keywords:
Mathematics Education, Learning Strategy, Chunking, College MathematicsAbstract
This study examined the effectiveness of the chunking technique in improving the mathematical problem-solving skills of college students. Chunking, a cognitive strategy grounded in Information Processing Theory, involves breaking information into meaningful units to reduce cognitive load and support working memory. Although widely discussed in psychology, its application in mathematics instruction—especially in teacher education—remains limited. To address this gap, a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design was employed among 60 college students enrolled in a state university during Academic Year 2025–2026. Participants were divided into a control group that received traditional instruction and a treatment group that received chunking-based lessons developed and validated by mathematics educators.
Pre-test results indicated comparable baseline performance between groups. Post-test data, however, revealed considerably higher scores for the treatment group (M=33.20) compared to the control group (M=25.90), indicating significant improvement in mathematical problem-solving performance. Both groups also demonstrated significant gains from pre-test to post-test, though the treatment group’s improvement was notably greater. Qualitative feedback further reflected positive changes in students’ mathematical attitudes, particularly in confidence, strategy use, and perceived manageability of complex problems.
Findings suggest that chunking can serve as an effective instructional strategy for teaching multi-step mathematical tasks in higher education. Beyond improving student performance, the approach offers a practical framework that may benefit future mathematics teachers, bridging the gap between cognitive research and classroom instruction.
References
Alhadi, M.A.A. (2024). Effects of Chunking Intervention on Enhancing Geometry Performance in High School Students with Mathematics Learning Difficulties. From https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/t3-8n6y-9x04
Anami, C., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2021). Mathematical Problem-solving: Students’ Cognitive Level for Solving HOTS Problem in Terms of Mathematical Ability. From http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211122.009
Anggo, M., & La Arapu. (2018). The use of mathematics teaching aids to train metacognition ability of elementary school students. From https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1028/1/012143
Boadu, S., & Boateng, F. (2024). Enhancing students’ achievement in mathematics education in the 21st century through technology integration, collaborative learning, and student motivation: The mediating role of student interest. From https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15622
Boettcher, J. V.,&Conrad, R. M. (2016). The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and Practical Pedagogical Tips. John Wiley&Sons.
Campbell, S, Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. From https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
David, L. "Information Processing Theory," in Learning Theories, December 4, 2015. Accessed on November 28, 2019. From https://www.learning-theories.com/information-processing-theory.html
Elliott, S. N. (2017). The social validity of “acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms”: Inferences from longitudinal evidence. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917739021
Emslander, V., & Scherer, R. (2022). The relation between executive functions and math intelligence in preschool children: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 148(5–6), 337–369. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000369
Fuchs, K. (2021). Book Review of The Online Teaching Survival Guide: Simple and Practical Pedagogical Tips. From https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/10981
Gal, H., & Linchevski, L. (2010). To see or not to see: analyzing difficulties in geometry from the perspective of visual perception. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9232-y
Geary, D. C. (2003). Evolution and development of folk knowledge: Implications for children’s learning. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037003322299052
Hatague, A. & Nabua, E (2019). Information-Processing Theory: Implication to Mathematics Education. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338132660_INFORMATION_PROCESSING_THEORY_IMPLICATION_TO_MATHEMATICS_EDUCATION
Hedges, L. V., Pustejovsky, J. E., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). A standardized mean difference effect size for multiple baseline designs across individuals. Research Synthesis Methods, 4(4), 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1086
Hiebert, J.,&Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 1(1), 371-404
Information-Processing Theory. Accessed on December 13, 2019. From http://www.educationau.edu.au/archives/cp/04h.htm
Isbilen, E. S., McCauley, S. M., Kidd, E., & Christiansen, M. H. (2020). Statistically induced chunking recall: A memory‐based approach to statistical learning. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12848–n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12848
Jiang, P., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., & Xiong, B. (2022). Preservice mathematics teachers’ perceptions of mathematical problem solving and its teaching: A case from China. From https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998586
Jitendra, A. K., & Hoff, K. (1996). The effects of schema-based instruction on the mathematical word-problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(4), 422–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900410
Jitendra, A. K.,&Star, J. R. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory into Practice, 50(1), 12– 19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534912
Juang, Y., Liu, T, & Chan, T. (2008). Computer-Supported Teacher Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge through Developing School-Based Curriculum. From https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220374495_Computer-supported_teacher_development_of_pedagogical_content_knowledge_through_developing_school-based_curriculum
Kloo, D., Osterhaus, C., Kristen‐Antonow, S., & Sodian, B. (2022). The impact of theory of mind and executive function on math and reading abilities: A longitudinal study. Infant and Child Development. From https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2356
Lanovaz, M. J., & Turgeon, S. (2020). How many tiers do we need? Type I errors and power in multiple baseline designs. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(3), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-020-00263-x
Larson, A. L., An, Z. G., Wood, C., Uchikoshi, Y., Cycyk, L. M., Scheffner Hammer, C., Escobar, K., & Roberts, K. (2020). Social validity in early language interventions for dual language learners: A systematic review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 40(1), 39–51.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Loveless, T. (2016). International trends in mathematics and science achievement, curriculum, and instruction: Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Paris: IEA, 90.
Myers, J. A., Brownell, M. T., Griffin, C. C., Hughes, E. M., Witzel, B. S., Gage, N. A., Peyton, D., Acosta, K., & Wang, J. (2021). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with mathematics difficulties: A meta‐analysis. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 36(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12244
Naidoo, J., & Kapofu, W. (2020). Exploring female learners’ perceptions of learning geometry in mathematics. South African Journal of Education, 40(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v40n1a1727
Oberauer, K., Thalmann, M., & Souza, A. (2019). How does chunking help working memory? From https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000578
Pentang, J., Andrade, L.J., Golben, J., Talua, J., Bautista, R., Sercenia, J., Permantasari, D., Bucad, M., & Viernes, M.D. (2024). Problem-solving difficulties, performance, and differences among preservice teachers in Western Philippines University. From https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2024.16.1.07
Sharkey, L. (2025). Unlocking the power of chunking: Reducing cognitive load. From https://www.pearson.com/en-au/schools/insights-news/unlocking-the-power-of-chunking-reducing-cognitive-load/#:~:text=Cognitive%20load%20theory%2C%20developed%20by,leads%20to%20feelings%20of%20overwhelm.
Slate, J., & Charlesworth, J. (1988). Information Processing Theory: Classroom Applications. From https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED293792
Valdez, F.A. (2023). Error analysis and correlates of verbal problem solving performance of pre-service mathematics teachers
Viesel-Nordmeyer, N., Ritterfeld, U., & Bos, W. (2021). Acquisition of mathematical and linguistic skills in children with learning difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 793796–793796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.793796
Warli, I. C., & Rahayu, P. (2020). Scaffolding process based on students’ diagnostic difficulties in proving group problems by using mathematics mapping. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 12012–. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1422/1/012012
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., Aoyama, K., & Sugiman, S. (2019). Diagnosing students’ learning difficulties in the eyes of Indonesian mathematics teachers. IndoMS-Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364
Yamaguchi, M., & Logan, G. D. (2014). Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Revealing chunking in skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 40(2), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033809
Yamaguchi, M., & Logan, G. D. (2016). Pushing typists back on the learning curve: Memory chunking in the hierarchical control of skilled typewriting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(12), 1919– 1936. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000288
Yani, M. & Rosma, F. (2020). Improving students’ spatial ability by using macromedia flash on geometry materials. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v3i1.2401
Zeitlhofer, I., Zumbach, J. & Schweppe, J. (2024). Complexity affects performance, cognitive load, and awareness. From https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102001
Zentall, S. S. (2005). Theory- and evidence-based strategies for children with attentional problems. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20114
Zhang, D., & Xin, Y. P. (2012). A follow-up meta-analysis for word-problem-solving interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. The Journal of Educational Research (Washington, D.C.), 105(5), 303–318
Zhang, D., Ding, Y., Stegall, J.,&Mo, L. (2012). The effect of visual-chunking representation accommodation on geometry testing for students with math disabilities. From https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00364.x
Zhang, D., Indyk, A., & Greenstein, S. (2020). Effects of Schematic Chunking on Enhancing Geometry Performance in Students with Math Difficulties and Students at Risk of Math Failure. From https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720902400
Zhang, D., Wang, Q., Ding, Y., & Liu, J. J. (2014). Testing accommodation or modification? The effects of integrated object representation on enhancing geometry performance in children with and without geometry difficulties. From https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413507602
