Organizational Readiness, Administrative Process Requirements, and Privacy Measures for the Centralized Digital Profile System

Authors

  • Kristoffer Jul R. Salomon Graduate School, Northwest Samar State University Author
  • Grace Anne A. Pocson Graduate School, Northwest Samar State University Author
  • Ivy Niezel M. Araneta Graduate School, Northwest Samar State University Author
  • Carmina J. Alboroto Graduate School, Northwest Samar State University Author
  • Katrina B. Ora Graduate School, Northwest Samar State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.361

Keywords:

Organizational readiness, administrative process requirements, privacy measures, centralized digital profile system, educational institution

Abstract

This study determined the level of organizational readiness, administrative process requirements, and privacy measures for the implementation of a Centralized Digital Profile System at St. Jude Thaddeus International School, Díli, Timor-Leste. It also examined the relationships between the profile of the respondent groups and their perceptions of organizational readiness, administrative process requirements, and privacy measures, as well as the relationship among the three major study variables. The study employed a descriptive-correlational research design with 98 respondents composed of 5 key officials, 68 teachers, and 25 staff. Data were gathered using a researcher-developed and validated questionnaire that obtained an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90, interpreted as excellent reliability. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Mann–Whitney U test, Kruskal–Wallis H test, and Spearman rho correlation. Findings revealed that organizational readiness was rated high, administrative process requirements were rated high, and privacy measures were implemented to a great extent. Significant relationships were found between selected profile variables and the respondents’ perceptions of organizational readiness, administrative process requirements, and privacy measures, particularly in terms of age, educational attainment, and position, while sex showed no significant relationship. Significant relationships were also established among organizational readiness, administrative process requirements, and privacy measures. The study concludes that successful implementation of the Centralized Digital Profile System depends on the integration of institutional preparedness, structured administrative processes, and strong privacy safeguards. It recommends strengthening staff participation, financial preparedness, workflow automation, data protection policies, access controls, and continuous cybersecurity training. A strategic implementation plan was proposed to support effective, secure, and sustainable system adoption.

References

Abraham, R., Schneider, J., & vom Brocke, J. (2019). Data governance: A conceptual framework. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(6), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00586-w

Begicevic Redjep, N., Balaban, I., & Zugec, B. (2021). Assessing digital maturity of schools: Framework and instrument. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(5), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1944291

Berghaus, S., & Back, A. (2024). Organizational digital transformation readiness: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 3283–3304. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19040159

Carmo, J. E. S., Lacerda, D. P., Klingenberg, C. O., & Piran, F. A. S. (2025). Digital transformation in the management of higher education institutions. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.10069

Cheng, E. C. K., & Wang, T. (2023). Leading digital transformation and eliminating barriers for teachers to incorporate artificial intelligence in basic education in Hong Kong. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100171

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.

European Commission. (2020). Digital education action plan (2021–2027). https://education.ec.europa.eu

McCarthy, A. M., Maor, D., McConney, A., & Cavanaugh, C. (2023). Digital transformation in education: Critical components for leaders of system change. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100479⁠

Mergel, I., Edelmann, N., & Haug, N. (2019). Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002

Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023). Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of Education 4.0. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 194, 122664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Cybersecurity framework (CSF) 2.0. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://www.nist.gov

OECD. (2023). Digital government review: Strengthening the digital transformation of the public sector. OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework. OECD Publishing.

Poulová, P., Simonová, I., & Kacetl, J. (2024). Evaluating digital maturity in higher education institutions. Digital, 6(4), 130.

Rothwell, W. J. (2022). Effective succession planning (6th ed.). AMACOM.

Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). Wiley.

Schmitz, M.-L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 204, 104880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104880

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org

United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2024). National educational technology plan.

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901.

Veseli, A., Hasanaj, P., & Bajraktari, A. (2025). Perceptions of organizational change readiness for sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability, 17(2), 619. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020619

Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2018). Principles of information security (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

World Bank. (2021). Digital development overview. https://www.worldbank.org

Downloads

Published

2026-05-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Salomon, K. J., Pocson, G. A., Araneta, I. N., Alboroto, C., & Ora, K. (2026). Organizational Readiness, Administrative Process Requirements, and Privacy Measures for the Centralized Digital Profile System. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 1613-1618. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.361