Transparency, Accountability and Ethical Leadership Practices of School Heads: Their Influence on Teacher Commitment and School Climate

Authors

  • Neil Adrian G. Ayento, MAEM Teacher III/ School-In-Charge, Department of Education, Sagbayan Sur, Sagbayan, Bohol, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.312

Keywords:

Accountability, Ethical Leadership, School Climate, Teacher Commitment, Transparency

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between leadership practices—transparency, accountability, and ethical leadership—of school heads in the Division of Bohol and their influence on teachers’ commitment and school climate during the School Year 2025–2026. Anchored on Ethical Leadership Theory (Brown and Treviño, 2006), Meyer and Allen’s (1997) organizational commitment model, and Pekrun’s (2006) Control-Value Theory, the study employed a quantitative, descriptive-correlational design. Data were collected from 353 elementary school teachers using structured survey instruments measuring leadership practices, teacher commitment, and school climate. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, ANOVA, t-test, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. Findings revealed that transparency was the most positively perceived leadership practice and showed strong positive relationships with teacher commitment and moderate positive relationships with school climate. Accountability, however, demonstrated negative relationships with both teacher commitment and school climate, suggesting issues in its implementation. Ethical leadership showed a positive relationship with teacher commitment but a negative relationship with school climate. Teacher commitment emerged as the strongest predictor of leadership practices, while school climate negatively predicted transparency and accountability. Differences in perceptions of transparency were observed across age and length of service, while accountability and ethical leadership were consistently perceived across demographic groups. The study concludes that leadership practices significantly shape teacher attitudes and organizational conditions, with transparency playing a critical role in fostering positive outcomes. It recommends strengthening leadership development, improving accountability approaches, and enhancing teacher commitment. This study supports SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions) by promoting effective educational leadership and governance. It contributes to institutional and socio-educational sustainability by improving leadership practices, strengthening teacher commitment, and fostering a supportive school climate.

References

Amabibi, F. I., & Mbarawii, W. (2024). Collaboration and accountability: Principal ethical leadership behavior and job commitment in public senior secondary schools in Rivers State. International Journal of Institutional Leadership, Policy and Management, 6(3), 348–365.

Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004

Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.

Department of Education. (2020). Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/DO_s2020_024.pdf

Fullan, M. (2014). The principal: Three keys to maximizing impact. Jossey-Bass.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554.

Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED403654

Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction: What the data tell us. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(8), 47–51.

Klusmann, U., Richter, D., & Lüdtke, O. (2016). Teachers’ emotional exhaustion is negatively related to students’ achievement: Evidence from a large-scale assessment study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(8), 1193–1203.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2017). The leadership challenge: How to make extraordinary things happen in organizations (6th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Kuo, C. H., & Tsai, H. L. (2021). Transformational leadership and teacher commitment: The mediating role of trust and collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220916872

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal leadership and teacher outcomes: A systematic review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 589–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769014

Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications.

Nordin, N., & Abas, M. (2021). Transparent leadership and trust in Malaysian public schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1878349

OECD. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.

Pekrun, R. (2006). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Santiago, R., & Luna, C. (2022). Accountability in educational leadership. Philippine Journal of Education, 95(1), 45–58.

Starratt, R. J. (2004). Ethical leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Tajeddini, K., Keshavarz, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). Ethical leadership and teacher trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 60(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2020-0101

Tan, C., & Ibrahim, H. (2023). Leadership style and teacher well-being. Educational Management Administration & Leadership. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231123845

Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907

Wang, Y. (2004). Observations on the organizational commitment of Chinese employees. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 5(2), 231–248.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-27

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ayento, N. A. (2026). Transparency, Accountability and Ethical Leadership Practices of School Heads: Their Influence on Teacher Commitment and School Climate. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 1226-1232. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.312