Supervisory Leadership Styles of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Department Heads and their Impact on Instructional Quality

Authors

  • Maryleen B. Vitug Institute of Graduate and Professional Studies,Lyceum-Northwestern University, Dagupan City, Pangasinan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.196

Keywords:

Instructional Quality, Supervisory Leadership Styles, Secondary Schools

Abstract

This study examined the instructional quality across different supervisory leadership styles in secondary schools. It specifically aimed to determine the level of instructional quality in terms of classroom management, instructional delivery, assessment practices, feedback, reflective teaching, and technology integration, as well as to analyze how leadership practices influence teacher performance and instructional effectiveness. The study was conducted in selected secondary schools within the local school context where department heads play a key role in instructional supervision and teacher development. A descriptive–correlational research design was employed, utilizing a survey questionnaire as the primary data-gathering instrument. The respondents were secondary school teachers selected through appropriate sampling techniques. Data were analyzed using weighted mean, standard deviation, and inferential statistics such as t-test and correlation analysis to determine relationships between leadership styles and instructional quality. Findings revealed that instructional quality is generally at a moderate level, indicating that teachers demonstrate competence in basic classroom management and instructional delivery, but show less consistency in assessment practices, reflective teaching, feedback provision, and technology integration. Results also indicated that leadership styles have a significant influence on instructional quality, with more supportive, instructional, and situational leadership approaches contributing to better teacher performance compared to less instructional-focused styles. In conclusion, instructional quality in schools is functional but uneven, and is strongly influenced by the type and consistency of supervisory leadership provided by department heads. It is recommended that schools strengthen instructional leadership practices through continuous coaching, structured feedback systems, and targeted professional development programs to enhance teaching effectiveness and promote sustained instructional improvement.

References

Abayomi, T., Adewale, F., & Bello, R. (2024). Leadership training needs for department heads in secondary education: A focus on instructional coaching and data literacy. Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 15(1), 45–62.

Anabo, R. O., & Rapada Jr., V. P. (2024). Leadership Styles of School Heads and Performance of Teachers in Eastern Samar Division. TWIST, 19(3), 713 717.

Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden, Inc.

Bush, T. (2011). Theories of educational leadership and management (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Chang, S., Lee, M., & Park, J. (2023). Emotional intelligence in school leadership: Reducing teacher burnout and increasing commitment. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(2), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/ijep.2023.12.2.98

Danielson, C. (2011). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument (2011 ed.). The Danielson Group.

Datnow, A., & Hubbard, L. (2016). Teacher capacity for data-driven decision making. Journal of Educational Change, 17(1), 7–28.

DepEd Order No. 42, s. 2017). Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST). Department of Education, Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Galanida, N. (2025). School Heads’ Instructional Leadership Styles and Administrative Challenges as Perceived by School Heads and Teachers in The Philippines.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2018). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (10th ed.). Pearson.

Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (2005). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248.

Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership and school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, D. E. (2013). Management of organizational behavior (10th ed.). Pearson.

Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (2009). Management of organizational behavior: Leading human resources (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Leithwood, K. (2022). Transformational school leadership for large scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829

Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42.

Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational leadership effects. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

Mariano, A. M. L., & Oco, R. M. (2024). Leadership styles of school heads and their impact on teachers’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Analysis, 7(8), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v7-i08-34

Oladipo, G, Tyokyaa, C. I., & Mando, P. N. (2023). Perceived Influence of Principals’ Leadership Styles on Teachers’ Job Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Benue State, Nigeria. African Journal of Educational Management, 25(2), 486–506.

Padilla, J. P. (2025). Transformational leadership and organizational performance in Sultan Kudarat schools. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 22(1), 33–50.

Republic Act No. 9155: Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/republic-act-no-9155/

Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

Roxas, A. L., & Pabualan, R. V. (2025). Strategic and transformational leadership as correlates of teacher job satisfaction in Misamis Oriental. Mindanao Journal of Education and Development, 18(1), 77–95.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Somech, A. (2005). Participative leadership in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(5), 777–800.

UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. UNESCO Publishing.

Usmanov, N. (2024). “Impact of Instructional Leadership on Teacher Development and Student Performance in Senior High Schools

Vicera, R., & Maico, R. (2019). Synergy between transformational and transactional leadership: Effects on teacher instructional competence. Journal of Philippine Education, 15(4), 210–228.

Wikipedia contributors. (2024). Teacher leadership. In Wikipedia. Retrieved [date], from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teacher_leadership

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Vitug , M. (2026). Supervisory Leadership Styles of Technology and Livelihood Education (TLE) Department Heads and their Impact on Instructional Quality . International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 336-343. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.196