Leadership Practices of Supreme Elementary Learner Government Officers in Public Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Rina P. Fadri, MAEd Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.173

Keywords:

leadership practices, SELG officers, student leadership, descriptive survey, elementary education, educational management, school governance

Abstract

This study assessed the leadership practices of Supreme Elementary Learner Government (SELG) officers in public elementary schools in Teresa District, Schools Division Office of Rizal for School Year 2025–2026. Specifically, it examined leadership practices in terms of planning and organization, communication and collaboration, decision-making and problem-solving, and initiative and responsibility, as well as the challenges encountered by SELG officers. A descriptive survey research design was utilized, employing a researcher-made questionnaire-checklist as the primary data-gathering instrument. The respondents included seven (7) SELG advisers and ninety-one (91) SELG officers from selected public elementary schools.Findings revealed that SELG advisers were mostly 31 years old and above, predominantly female, and highly experienced, with most holding Teacher III and Master Teacher positions and having attended national-level trainings. Meanwhile, SELG officers were mostly 10–12 years old, predominantly female, first-born children, and came from families with more than two children, with most parents being college graduates and employed, earning a monthly family income of at least ₱25,000.In terms of leadership practices, SELG advisers perceived the officers as very highly effective in planning and organization, and highly effective in other domains, while SELG officers rated themselves as very highly effective across all aspects. A significant difference was found between the perceptions of advisers and officers regarding leadership practices. However, no significant differences were observed in the perceptions of advisers when grouped according to their profile variables. In contrast, SELG officers’ perceptions significantly differed when grouped according to sibling position, number of children in the family, parents’ educational attainment, and parents’ occupation, while no significant differences were found in terms of age and sex. Challenges encountered by SELG officers included balancing academic responsibilities and limited financial resources.The study concluded that differences in perceptions exist between advisers and officers, and that certain socio-demographic factors influence officers’ leadership perceptions. It is recommended that schools implement leadership training programs, provide continuous professional development for advisers, and create more leadership opportunities for students.

References

1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines, Article II, Section 13.

Aquino, J. (2022). Emotional intelligence and leadership efficacy among student leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 45–60.

Dabesa, S. (2022). The impact of leadership practices on student achievement. Journal of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, 6(3), 12–25.

Dedicatoria, M. (2023). Student leadership perceptions and participation in school organizations. Asian Journal of Education and Development, 8(1), 33–47.

Department of Education. (2014). DepEd Order No. 47, s. 2014: Constitution and by-laws of the Supreme Pupil Government and Supreme Student Government. Department of Education, Philippines.

Department of Education. (2014). DepEd Order No. 47, s. 2014: Constitution and by-laws of the Supreme Pupil Government and Supreme Student Government. Department of Education, Philippines.Journal.

Madrid, L. (2024). Student leadership and nation-building: Roles and responsibilities of youth leaders. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 15(1), 21–35.

Manangan, R. (2022). Leadership practices and school climate: Implications for student development. Journal of Educational Management, 7(2), 55–68.

Musni, A. (2024). Leadership styles and their impact on student organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Studies, 12(1), 40–52.

Pansacala, M. (2024). Leadership practices and student outcomes in basic education. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 77–90.

Polatcan, M. (2023). Leadership self-efficacy and its influence on leadership practices. Educational Management Review, 11(3), 101–115.

Ramirez, J. (2023). Essential skills for effective leadership in educational settings. Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(2), 66–79.

Soriano, P. (2022). Leadership development programs in schools: A necessity for student success. Educational Research and Practice, 8(4), 88–102.

Taylor, R. (2024). Leadership styles and student engagement in learning environments. Journal of School Leadership, 18(1), 23–39.

Wangmo, K. (2025). Challenges in student leadership: A study on adaptability and resource limitations. International Journal of Youth Leadership, 5(1), 15–28.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fadri, R. (2026). Leadership Practices of Supreme Elementary Learner Government Officers in Public Elementary Schools. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(2), 148-157. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I2.173