Pedagogical Approaches and Work Performance of Teachers in Public Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Analiza C. Dilidili ,MAEd Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I1.135

Keywords:

pedagogical approaches, work performance, elementary teachers, constructivist approach, inquiry-based learning, descriptive survey, IPCR

Abstract

This study examined the pedagogical approaches and work performance of teachers in public elementary schools in Teresa District during the School Year 2024–2025. Specifically, it identified the extent to which constructivist, inquiry-based, reflective, collaborative, and integrative approaches were utilized and determined their relationship with teachers’ work performance. A descriptive survey research design complemented by documentary analysis was employed. The respondents consisted of 268 teachers from seven public elementary schools, selected through total population sampling. Data on pedagogical approaches were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire-checklist, while work performance was measured through the teachers’ Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) results.Findings revealed that the majority of teacher-respondents were middle-aged, predominantly female, married, and holders of a baccalaureate degree, with 5–9 years of teaching experience and occupying Teacher I positions. They had participated in various in-service trainings. The results further showed that pedagogical approaches were “often utilized” across all five domains. Statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the extent of pedagogical approaches when grouped according to demographic variables. Moreover, teachers demonstrated a “very satisfactory” level of work performance based on their IPCR ratings. Notably, no significant relationship was found between pedagogical approaches and work performance.The study concluded that teachers’ demographic characteristics do not significantly influence their pedagogical practices, and the use of varied pedagogical approaches does not directly correlate with their work performance. It is recommended that school administrators promote the integration of technology, foster collaborative learning environments, and support differentiated instruction. Teachers are encouraged to continuously apply effective pedagogical strategies to enhance student engagement and learning outcomes. The proposed action plan may be implemented, and future studies may explore additional variables.

References

Adams, L., & Brown, S. (2022). Performance assessment tools and their influence on teacher effectiveness: A comprehensive study. Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 421–438.

Agpasa, L. M. (2022). Influence of teacher demographic profiles on the use of pedagogical approaches. Philippine Journal of Education Research, 14(2), 55–68.

Ampang, A. (2023). Effectiveness of innovative teaching strategies in primary education. International Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 112–125.

Brown, S. (2021). Continuous feedback and support: Essential elements of teacher performance evaluation. Teaching and Learning Quarterly, 33(1), 56–71.

Cruz, C. E. (2024). The effectiveness of the Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form as an evaluation tool to improve teachers’ performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(2).

De Leon, P. (2024). Impact of varied teaching approaches on student academic performance. Philippine Journal of Education, 18(1), 23–38.

Department of Education (DepEd). (2017). DO 42, s. 2017: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) [Policy document]. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education (DepEd). (2024). DepEd Order No. 10, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum [Policy document]. https://www.deped.gov.ph

Evangelio, M. T. (2022). Student-centered pedagogical practices in elementary classrooms. Journal of Philippine Education, 12(3), 44–58.

Fernandez, S. (2020). Localized teacher performance evaluation methods and their adaptation to the Philippines’ unique needs. Philippine Educational Review, 34(3), 211–228.

Heider, S. (2023). Teaching practices and student academic performance: A global perspective. International Journal of Education, 15(4), 201–215.

Janardhanan, R. (2024). Pedagogy, technology integration, and student success in primary education. Educational Research Review, 11(2), 45–63.

Malgapo, R. (2020). Utilization of pedagogical approaches in Philippine elementary classrooms. Philippine Educational Review, 10(1), 77–90.

Nasibi, A. (2022). Enhancing learners’ abilities through effective pedagogical skills. Asian Journal of Education Research, 7(2), 89–104.

Philippine Constitution of 1987. (1987). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/

Purwanto, A. (2020). Pedagogical competence and learning outcomes: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Educational Development, 5(3), 31–45.

Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/

Republic Act No. 9155. (2001). Governance of Basic Education Act of 2001. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/

Roallos, J. (2022). Classroom practices and teacher performance in public schools. Journal of Philippine Education Research, 16(2), 88–102.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-26

How to Cite

Dilidili , A. (2026). Pedagogical Approaches and Work Performance of Teachers in Public Elementary Schools. International Journal of Sustainability and Advanced Integrated Research, 2(1), 1090-1097. https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I1.135