Impact Assessment of Outreach Activities of the Graduate Studies Program of Tomas Claudio Colleges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I1.117Keywords:
outreach activities, graduate studies program, impact assessment, teachers’ perceptions, community extension, educational outreach.Abstract
This study aimed to determine the impact assessment of the outreach activities of the Graduate Studies Program of Tomas Claudio Colleges during the School Year 2021–2022. Specifically, it examined the perceptions of key teachers and teachers from the Baras, Binangonan, and Pililla Sub-Offices regarding the extent of the program’s outreach initiatives in terms of goals and objectives, projects and activities, and monitoring and evaluation. The respondents consisted of 59 key teachers and 228 teachers who were selected using purposive sampling. Descriptive research design was employed, utilizing three sets of researcher-made questionnaire-checklists to gather the necessary data. The respondents were described according to age, sex, civil status, position title, educational attainment, length of service, and seminars and trainings attended.Findings revealed that most key teacher-respondents were aged 40–49 years old, female, married, holding Head Teacher positions, holders of MAT/MAED degrees, had 21–30 years of service, and had attended international-level seminars and trainings. In contrast, most teacher-respondents were aged 21–29 years old, female, married, holding Teacher III positions, MAT/MAED holders, had 11–20 years of service, and had attended regional-level seminars and trainings. Both groups generally perceived that the outreach activities of the Graduate Studies Program had an impact on goals and objectives, projects and activities, and monitoring and evaluation. However, results showed a significant difference between the perceptions of the two groups regarding the extent of impact assessment of these outreach activities.Moreover, most profile variables of both groups were not significantly related to their perceptions, except for some aspects such as educational attainment and seminars attended among key teachers, and age among teachers in relation to selected variables. The respondents also reported moderate challenges, including limited time to conduct research, lack of research guidance, and minimal sponsorship or partnerships for outreach initiatives. The study concludes that while outreach activities are recognized as impactful, differences in perceptions and existing challenges highlight the need for stronger collaboration, support mechanisms, and research-oriented engagement in outreach programs.
References
Capulso, C. (2017). Community outreach programs in higher education institutions: Impacts on student and faculty engagement. Philippine Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 45–58.
Cervantes, R., Santos, M., & De Guzman, J. (2018). Effects of extension programs on community development: Evidence from Philippine higher education institutions. Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 22–37.
Findler, F., Schönherr, R., Lozano, R., & Stacherl, B. (2019). Sustainability-oriented universities: Assessing the impact of community engagement initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 234, 1230–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.123
Harris, B., Smith, J., & Lee, A. (2020). Teacher participation in outreach activities: Effects on engagement and trust in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 657–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1723456
McAnn, T., Rogers, P., & Kline, S. (2022). Obstacles and strategies in integrating research and outreach in academic careers. Research in Higher Education, 63(4), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-021-09655-3
Nuncio, L., Villanueva, R., & Morales, P. (2020). Evaluating engagement in educational outreach programs: Teacher and participant perspectives. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 7(1), 15–30.
Republic of the Philippines. (2007). Republic Act No. 9418: Volunteerism Act of 2007. Official Gazette. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2007/03/03/republic-act-no-9418/
Seehamat, S., Jamaludin, R., & Ahmad, F. (2014). Needs assessment as a foundational tool for curriculum development. International Journal of Educational Development, 37, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.01.003
Suresa, S. (2019). Enhancing student competencies through university-led outreach programs. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(3), 507–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1558976
Vennix, H., & van den Brok, J. (2018). The influence of outreach learning environments on student motivation and attitudes. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003
Vermix, H., & van den Brok, J. (2018). Characteristics of outreach activities related to autonomous motivation and positive attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1045–1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000251
