Policy Coherence and Governance Gaps in Maritime Decarbonization: Implications for the Philippine Domestic Ferry Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65339/ijsair.V2.I3.859Keywords:
Climate Action, Domestic Ferry Sector, Governance Gaps, Maritime Decarbonization, Philippine Maritime Sector, Policy Coherence, Stakeholder Coordination, Sustainable Maritime Transport, Sustainability TransitionsAbstract
This study examined policy coherence and governance gaps in maritime decarbonization and their implications for the Philippine domestic ferry sector. It aimed to determine how existing policies, institutional arrangements, and governance mechanisms influence the sector’s transition toward sustainable maritime operations. The study was guided by governance, institutional, and sustainability transition perspectives that emphasize the importance of policy alignment, stakeholder collaboration, and coordinated action in achieving decarbonization goals. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was employed, involving 100 purposively selected maritime stakeholders from government agencies, port authorities, domestic ferry operators, and maritime-related organizations. Data were collected through a researcher-developed adaptive survey questionnaire that assessed policy coherence, governance gaps, and maritime decarbonization preparedness. The findings revealed that existing maritime policies and governance mechanisms provide a supportive foundation for decarbonization efforts; however, challenges remain in regulatory consistency, institutional coordination, financing support, technological and infrastructure development, data management, and workforce capacity. The results further showed that the Philippine domestic ferry sector demonstrates readiness in institutional, technological, and operational aspects, but resource availability remains a significant concern. The study concluded that successful maritime decarbonization requires stronger policy integration, improved inter-agency collaboration, enhanced investment mechanisms, reliable information systems, and sustained institutional support. The study contributes to Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on Climate Action and SDG 9 on Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure by promoting climate-responsive maritime governance, sustainable transport systems, and improved infrastructure readiness. Its sustainability contribution lies in strengthening policy and governance frameworks that support environmental sustainability, institutional resilience, and the long-term transition of the Philippine domestic ferry sector toward low-carbon maritime operations.
References
Adamowicz, M. (2022). Decarbonisation of maritime transport—European Union measures as an inspiration for global solutions? Marine Policy, 145, 105085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105085
Baştuğ, S., Haralambides, H., Esmer, S., & Eminoğlu, E. (2024). A decision-making framework for the funding of shipping decarbonization initiatives in non-EU countries: Insights from Türkiye. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 9, Article 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-024-00172-1
Chen, S., Zheng, S., & Sys, C. (2023). Policies focusing on market-based measures towards shipping decarbonization: Designs, impacts and avenues for future research. Transport Policy, 137, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.04.006
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2020). Shipping criteria: The Climate Bonds Standard and Certification Scheme. Climate Bonds Initiative.
Climate Change Commission. (2024). The Philippines’ nationally determined contribution implementation plan 2020–2030. Office of the President of the Philippines.
Cret, L., Baudry, M., & Lantz, F. (2024). How to implement the 2023 IMO GHG strategy? Insights on the importance of combining policy instruments and on the role of uncertainty. Marine Policy, 169, 106332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106332
Deng, S., Miola, A., Zhang, Y., & Wang, N. (2023). A review on carbon emissions of global shipping. Marine Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44312-023-00001-2
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
DNV. (2023). New study of seafarer training and skills needed to support decarbonization. DNV.
DNV. (2025). Maritime forecast to 2050. DNV.
Dong, J., Zeng, J., Yang, Y., & Wang, H. (2022). A review of law and policy on decarbonization of shipping. Frontiers in Marine Science, 9, Article 1076352. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.1076352
European Commission. (2025). Monitoring, reporting and verification of maritime transport emissions. Directorate-General for Climate Action.
European Maritime Safety Agency. (2024). TRAINALTER: Study on the identification of specific competences for seafarers on ships using alternative fuels and energy systems. EMSA.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
Giest, S. (2023). Policy capacity mechanisms for addressing complex, place-based sustainability challenges. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
Inal, O. B., Dere, C., Zincir, B., & Deniz, C. (2022). Hybrid propulsion and alternative fuels education in the course of decarbonised shipping. Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs, 14(2).
International Chamber of Shipping. (2022). Mapping a maritime just transition for seafarers: Insights into seafarer training and skills needed to support a decarbonized shipping industry.
International Energy Agency. (2023). The role of e-fuels in decarbonising transport. IEA.
International Energy Agency. (2024). Renewables 2024: Renewable fuels. IEA.
International Energy Agency. (2025). How the shipping sector could save on energy costs. IEA.
International Maritime Organization. (2023). 2023 IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from ships (Resolution MEPC.377[80]).
International Maritime Organization. (2025). Generic interim guidelines on training for seafarers on ships using alternative fuels and new technologies (STCW.7/Circ.25).
International Maritime Organization. (n.d.). IMO data collection system.
Jäger, J., Brutschin, E., Pianta, S., Omann, I., Kammerlander, M., Sudharmma Vishwanathan, S., Vrontisi, Z., MacDonald, J., & van Ruijven, B. (2023). Stakeholder engagement and decarbonization pathways: Meeting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, Article 1063719. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.1063719
Khabir, M., Hasan, M. M., & Islam, M. S. (2025). A strategic pathway to green digital shipping: Integrating decarbonization, digitalization, and human capital development. Logistics, 9(2), Article 68.
Li, W., Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., & Wong, Y. D. (2024). Pathways in the governance of shipping decarbonization: Balancing conflicting interests. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11, Article 1479528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1479528
Li, Y., Xie, W., Yang, Y., Mei, Q., Wang, Z., Li, Z., & Wang, P. (2023). Research on the carbon emissions traceability inventory and multi-horizon prediction of ship carbon emissions: A case study of Tianjin Port. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10, Article 1174411. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1174411
Maritime Industry Authority. (2024). Maritime Industry Development Plan 2028. Department of Transportation.
Maritime Just Transition Task Force. (2025). Considerations of training aspects for seafarers on ships powered by ammonia, methanol and hydrogen.
Masodzadeh, P. G., Ölçer, A. I., Ballini, F., & Christodoulou, A. (2022). A review on barriers to and solutions for shipping decarbonization: What could be the best policy approach for shipping decarbonization? Marine Pollution Bulletin, 184, Article 114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114008
Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller Center for Zero Carbon Shipping. (2022). Maritime decarbonization strategy 2022.
Niu, Q., Ma, X., & Wang, T. (2025). Charting a course for marine sustainability: Legal and policy coordination under multilateral frameworks. Frontiers in Marine Science.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Improving governance with policy evaluation: Lessons from country experiences. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Steering responses to climate change from the centre of government: A stocktaking. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). OECD public governance reviews: Whole-of-government coordination. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026a). Maritime transport CO₂ emissions database. OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026b). Public policy monitoring and evaluation. OECD Publishing.
Poseidon Principles Association. (2024). Poseidon Principles annual disclosure report 2024.
Pu, S., & Lam, J. S. L. (2021). Greenhouse gas impact of digitalizing shipping documents. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 101, Article 103113.
Republic of the Philippines. (2021). Nationally determined contribution communicated to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change on 15 April 2021. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Robalo-Cabrera, I., Alcayde, A., Filgueira-Vizoso, A., Castro-Santos, L., García-Diez, A. I., & Manzano-Agugliaro, F. (2025). Shipping sector decarbonisation measures: A review. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 82, Article 104549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2025.104549
Sheikh, W., Islam, T. M. R., & Hasan, K. R. (2025). Achieving net-zero emissions in shipping: The critical role of environmental awareness and managerial commitment. Ocean Engineering, 337, Article 121908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121908
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023: Towards a green and just transition. United Nations.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2025). Review of maritime transport 2025: Staying the course in turbulent waters. United Nations.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (n.d.). Nationally determined contributions.
Wang, S., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2025). Global coordination and challenges of technical standards in maritime decarbonization. Frontiers in Marine Science.
Wang, X., Yuen, K. F., Wong, Y. D., & Li, K. X. (2023). Multi-scale policy diffusion of marine emissions governance. Marine Policy, 153, 105637.
World Bank. (2021). Financing low-carbon transport solutions in developing countries. World Bank.
World Bank. (2026). Global Facility to Decarbonize Transport annual report 2025. World Bank.
World Maritime University. (2024). Maritime digitalisation and decarbonisation: A sustainable future. WMU Publications.
Wu, W. (2025). The international legal and practical development of maritime decarbonization: From the 2023 IMO strategy to the net-zero regulatory framework. Frontiers in Marine Science.
Ziakas, A., & Boile, M. (2025). Toward zero-emission ferries: Integrating systematic review and bibliometric analysis insights on alternative fuels and policies. Journal of Shipping and Trade. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-025-00217-z
